Democracy is great, but God’s
people are called to practice something better. We are of the Kingdom. Jesus
and the Bible were strikingly clear about this. There are no minced words.
Anything less than what Scripture tells us is pale by comparison. Why settle
for coming in second when we were promised the victors crown? Why settle for an
outhouse when we can live in a mansion? Why settle for fear and anxiety when we
were promised certainty and assurance.
John 18:36 Jesus answered, “My
kingdom is not of this world. If my kingdom were of this world, my servants
would have been fighting, that I might not be delivered over to the Jews. But
my kingdom is not from the world.”
Philippians 3:18-20 For as I have
often told you before, and now say again even with tears: Many live as enemies
of the cross of Christ. Their end is destruction, their god is their belly, and
their glory is in their shame. Their minds are set on earthly things. But our
citizenship is in heaven, and we eagerly await a Savior from there, the Lord
Jesus Christ
Our home. Our God. Our Ruler. Our
hope is in the Divine outlined in Scripture. Not flawed temporal earthly
vehicles, agents or tools. In America on the 4th of July some have a patriotic
service in their churches. Sometimes the United States national anthem is
played and pledge of allegiance is spoken. I don’t have issue with this as long
as God’s banner and Scripture are held in esteem above the flag and
Constitution. Render to Caesar that which is his but render to God everything.
Well, because its His anyway. Consider it a dual citizenship, After death we’re
still God’s subject, constituents in the Kingdom. After death the United States
holds no sway. The United State’s sovereignty and our dual citizenship stops at
death’s door. Ironically, God’s sovereignty stops nowhere as He is omnipotent
and omnipresent so in reality we’re merely expatriated here in this mortal
coil. The United States is renting property in God’s universe. If we understand
our roll as believers, we are called to lift the state of our expatriated
country to the lofty standards of the Kingdom. So…in a way we are failing the
Kingdom when we do not improve the conditions of the United States (and by
default, the world).
In truth many churches and
believers do this, or something similar, because they believe democracy is the
form of government God specially favors. Democracy is a kind of kingdom of God
on earth, and the United States has been chosen by God for spreading democracy
everywhere. I personally do not identify any national government with the
kingdom of God. I do not prefer that my beliefs and politics should necessarily
mix unless that they align with Scripture. Am I treasonous? No. Am I disloyal?
No. Am I expatiated with dual citizenship? Yes. But when the country I am
currently expatriated in forces its rule on me and it goes against the homeland
I am obliged to disobey.
When we try to merge the two
kingdoms harmoniously, I fear this goes too close to the edge. By merging the
Scripture to politics, we come or become dangerously close to religious
syncretism. Anything merged with God’s requirements….waters them down. Even
democracy. Many of us have lost sight of this. Some worship the Constitution
more than the Bible. As Christians we need to understand the Constitution is
reliant on the Bible not the other way around. We can allow temporal
allegiances to earthly national rule but it needs to have careful theological
parameters. What form of government does
God want people to live under? The answer to that question is embedded in
Israel’s history.
God used Moses to lead the
Israelites out of slavery to Mount Sinai where God gave them the Law. These
laws formed the basis for a new earthly government. That government was a
theocracy. In other words, God ran the government in a de facto manner. The
laws were based on obedience / loyalty to the God of Israel but one aspect of
Israel’s theocracy made it unique: It did not have an earthly king at the time
the Law was given. In the large picture, in the larger scope of history there
was more going on. The meta-narrative pointed to something much larger. It
pointed/points to a King who, in first appearances ruled in absentia but in
reality, He rules everywhere and at all times.
Israelites did not give their
allegiance to a king but to God alone. There was no central government, only a
loose confederation of tribes. Leadership was in the hands of local leaders
(elders, priests, prophets and in the case of war and/or disobedience, the
judges.) How did this form of government work out? Well, read the book of
Judges. It ended very poorly. There was no centralized authority. There was no
standing army. Israel was constantly vulnerable to attack and domination by
other nations. Furthermore, sins like envy and violence among the tribes and
between towns were frequent. Women and the vulnerable suffered horribly.
Leadership was often corrupt or deeply flawed. The Book of Judges paints a
picture of existence that was nasty, brutish and short. Even for the Judges
themselves. This would manifest in the time of the Kings. Invariably we
see the result of fallen capricious men in a role meant only for God. Until
Christ truly sits on the throne and rules absolutely there will be broken
leadership in the world.
Because it was apparent even to
fallen men that after a couple of hundred years of decentralized, local
leadership, the tribes of Israel said, “Enough” and demanded a king. The
prophet Samuel tried to warn them of the consequences:
1 Samuel 8:11-18 “These will be
the ways of the king who will reign over you: he will take your sons and
appoint them to his chariots and to be his horsemen and to run before his
chariots. And he will appoint for himself commanders of thousands and
commanders of fifties, and some to plow his ground and to reap his harvest, and
to make his implements of war and the equipment of his chariots. He will take
your daughters to be perfumers and cooks and bakers. He will take the best of
your fields and vineyards and olive orchards and give them to his servants. He will
take the tenth of your grain and of your vineyards and give it to his officers
and to his servants. He will take your male servants and female servants and
the best of your young men and your donkeys, and put them to his work. He will
take the tenth of your flocks, and you shall be his slaves. And in that day you
will cry out because of your king, whom you have chosen for yourselves, but the
Lord will not answer you in that day.”
In other words, having a king with
centralized power will result in a military-industrial complex, a draft, loss
of freedoms, heavy taxation and confiscation. Exactly as we see today in
westernized democracies. Nevertheless, this seemed a lot better than the chaos
of the time of the judges. Its the same chaos as today where everyone does what
is right in their own eyes. It is ironic that judgment therefore judges were/are sent because of the
disobedience of man. The byproduct of disobedience is chaos. Chaos itself is the judgement. The parallels to today in 2020 is frightening. So the
Israelites proceeded to create a monarchy. How well did this form of government
work out? According to history, not very well. Which in and of itself is why
history is important to preserve. We see the errors of the past, adapt and
improve. If we have no benchmark we start from zero. We start from the ground
up.
Saul, the first king, turned out
to be mental case. David, the next king, was highly effective, but he abused
his power to commit adultery and murder, and his eldest son led a civil war
against him. Solomon, the next king, attained the throne by murdering the
competition. He brought wealth into Israel but at the cost of the importation
of foreign gods and the implementation of oppressive labor. His reign was so
controversial that, after his son Solomon’s death, the nation split into
two—the north and the south—each with its own monarchy (insurrection,
secession). Wow, Bill Clinton, George Bush, Barack Obama, Joe Biden or Donald
Trump ring any bells for anyone? Splitting a nation in two. What we learned was that the two lines of
kings were generally worse than the ones who came before them. Eventually both
kingdoms were destroyed by invading empires across open borders, their kings assassinated or
imprisoned and their sons murdered. This portends a really awful end for the
United States if we continue on same said path.
So…around the time Israel
collapsed and became a dream, far away in Greece, in the city of Athens, people
were creating a new form of government called democracy. Citizens voted for
their leaders, and leaders served limited terms. The system was not ideal:
women, slaves and lower classes could not vote. Nevertheless, democracy was a
revolutionary idea. The theory would eventually be assimilated by the Roman Empire.
Which form of national government
would you prefer to live under today: a decentralized theocracy without Jesus
sitting on the throne, a monarchy without Jesus on the throne or a democracy?
Despite its never making an appearance in the Bible, I would choose democracy.
In truth, God has knowingly allowed humanity to move in this direction also
until Christ’s return.
Communism, socialism and all other
forms of governing or economics have failed. Why? Because they all relied on one
form or another of the ruler being or behaving, benevolent, honest, virtuous, fair, good. etc.
All descriptors of a perfect man that sinful man is incapable of achieving without God.
But there was one that did and until he returns to rule fully and forever…we’re
stuck with inferior substitutes. The alternatives to the substitute of democracy is much
worse. Ask history...Hitler, Stalin, Attila, Genghis Khan, Mao Zedong, Pol Pot, Caligula, Nero, Herod, etc.
But some will say nowhere in the
Bible do people vote or leaders serve for designated terms. Even Jesus never
promoted democracy. Jesus never asked his disciples, “Raise your hands if you
think we should go to Golgotha” or, “Who is in favor of Judas being our
treasurer?” Can you imagine if He did? This does not mean democracy is ideal. In fact, it has some seriously screwed-up drawbacks which we can clearly see today in 2020. Big
money has tremendous influence over elections and legislation. So does false
information and propaganda. The Internet has exacerbated these issues.
Something the founding fathers could’ve never foreseen. Those with control of
the internet media and the most money can hire the most lobbyists, afford the
most lawyers, file the most lawsuits, pull the most strings, fund the most
candidates and block or support the most legislation. They can censor, silence, slander and defame. The super-rich can fund their own campaigns or set up their
children in politics, creating a political or economic aristocracy (Kennedy, Bush, Biden). American democracy is
dominated by a wealthy elite. The New World Order isn’t coming. Its here. We
still have political recourse. We can still do grassroots internet sites to
spread the truth of Scripture. I am doing so now here on this blog. But it is drops of water against the tide.
The founding fathers of the United
States foresaw some of these potential flaws and tried to put checks and
balances in place to try and avoid them. But a recalcitrant child determined to
set a house on fire that he lives in will eventually succeed if he keeps trying
and that’s what we are seeing (socialism, communism, fascism). Rebellious
children continually disobeying. Continually twisting what they’ve been
forbidden from doing by asking the question, “Is that what Dad really said
we’re not allowed to do?” Not unlike the Israelites in the Old Testament. Not
unlike Adam and Eve in Genesis. There really is nothing new under the sun. Nothing. Hence our need
for Someone greater.
Another problem with democracy is
that the majority rules. This certainly sounds like a fair principle, but it
means the minority gets shut out. In American democracy we have a
winner-takes-all approach. If a candidate wins an election by the slimmest
percentile, he or she wins everything, and the other candidate-who received
almost the same number of votes-gets nothing. So the majority has the power to
impose its will on an equally sizable minority.
[Continued in Part II]
I will bring this all together in
the next post. I promise.