The Historical, Theological and Geographical Settings (Daniel 1:1-2)
Daniel 1:1-2 ~ In the third year of the reign of Jehoiakim king of Judah, Nebuchadnezzar king of
Historically
It has been errantly stated that the opening statements in (v.1-2) supposedly create a chronological/historical problem that troubles people/commentators. Some have stated (including John Calvin) that Nebuchadnezzar is called king here in a proleptic manner (existing before his proper historical time). This is based on the comparison or dissimilarity between Daniel and Jeremiah, this though can be chalked up to the possible usage of the Babylonian dating system used by Daniel and the Egyptian used in Jeremiah when referring to Jehoiakim's reign (Lucas 50-51). Regardless, the stories are set during the Babylonian Exile. We see God's plan of unfolding events unfolding in the real world in real history (Lucas 52).
Theologically
It is theologically asserted or implied throughout Daniel that the Babylonian exile is not due to the inability of
Geographically
The setting geographically and geopolitically...we see Babylonian incursion by siege warfare courtesy of Nebuchadnezzar into
Synopsis: God is a God of time and place therefore over Creation. He is also a God of Spirit and He is sovereign over all of them.
Daniel 2:1-49 Similarities to Genesis 41
The account of a slave or subservient brought before a ruler because his own, magicians, enchanters, sorcerers, astrologers or prognosticators cannot interpret the rulers dreams in Daniel 2:1-49 clearly parallels and is reminiscent of Joseph's interpretation of Pharaoh's dream in Genesis 41 and then is given position of second only to Pharaoh, although this should not just be considered a retelling of the same type of tale. Specifically the the parallels zero in on Genesis 41:8 verb usage being the same as Daniel 2:1 when used in reference to Pharaoh's and Nebuchadnezzar's "spirit[s] were/was troubled" . The subject similarities are basically (1) A king is worried by his dreams ad gets irate when his wise men cannot decipher it (2) A young Israelite exile is found who can (3) The young Israelites insists this ability is from God who is really the One worth of the king's praise (4) The dream(s) concern a future event. (5) the king promotes the young man to a position of honor. A noted difference though is that Daniel only interprets the dream, he does not offer advise as Joseph did.
We see the categorization of "court tales" acted out here. We should more properly see this as a court contest centering around interpretation of a dream as the mitigating factor. The following syllogism (loosely) outlines the court tale: (1) Sage acts as primary entertainer for king but sometimes must solve more vexing problem for ruler (2) Supposed wise courtiers shown to be bumbling idiots. (3) Sage on deathbed may impart words of wisdom (4) Sage may act as savior delivering King from vexation (5) Sage may experience disgrace followed by restoration.
What's Important? The Dream or The Story Itself?
The main point of the story is carried in the narrative...the dream is secondary to the narrative. The "mystery" it reveals is not the details of the course of events of history but the fact that history is under the control of God and that it has a purpose which will be achieved.
The narrative is a story of six acts. (1) Sages failure to interpret dream (v1-13), Daniel seeks and obtains dreams content from God (v14-23) (3) Daniel witnesses to the God who reveals mysteries (v24-28a), (4) Daniel recounts dream (v28b-35) (5) Daniel interprets dream (v36-45) (6) Nebuchadnezzar honors Daniel and his God (v.46-49). The irony in the whole storyline appears to be that Daniel essentially concurs with the court sages (v.27) conclusion that no man could possibly know what the king asks of them (v10-11) and this is exactly the point of entry and the statement about a God who can. A divine, sovereign and omniscient God who can reveal knowledge / wisdom / answers to mysteries unknown to men because He is sovereign and omniscient. The reason this happens is to ultimately bring glory to God because it shows nothing is hidden to Daniel's God and there is nothing He does not understand. Ultimate sovereignty and omniscience is in God's hands. This is great comfort to those who are about to or are currently undergoing persecution or suffering because they/we know that God is aware of what we are going through and what is happening to us and if He knows this and is sovereign... then He is allowing it for a reason (Andy's Note: this concept would then underlie some of the explanation for Theodicy).
Daniel's God: 1
Chaldean's god(s): 0
Winner: Daniel's God hands down.
No comments:
Post a Comment