A Supremist Religion VIII: Islam Means Submission or Death

Islam is a chain of submission. From the top down it is Allah, Muhammad, the Muslim, the Kafir, the dhimmi and the slave. In this country we are beginning to see how submission works. We’re not as far along as Europe, but Muslims have immigrated here and have started making their demands as we have seen in public Islamic calls to prayer in America’s first Muslim majority city in Hamtramck, Michigan and with “Clock Boy”. The first thing they demanded was that the textbooks of America must conform to their way of teaching about Islam. I’ve spoken with a history major at West Chester University in PA and he has confirmed this fact just as a precursory review of textbooks will show. Yet, Islam will claim they are just trying to fit in according to our rules and ethics.

This duality is explained in two phases that Islam manifests to the world. The face of Mecca and the face of Medina. Medina is the violent phase, the political phase. Mecca is the nice phase. What we have is that the Qur’an of Mecca is used as a shield. It’s the public face of Islam. Mecca is what Muslims always talk about peace with or to Kafirs. This duality, this subtlety is what makes Islam so powerful because you can’t just jump up and condemn Islam as being totally violent. It needs to be clarified like this and this is a critical distinction that all Kafir must understand about Islam.

It isn’t that all Muslims are peaceful or all Muslims are violent at any one given time. It is unique characteristic of Islam that it allows all Muslims to be peaceful at any one given moment or allows them to all be violent at any one given tie based on their current political military position. This is obviously based on Jihad an whether or not they feel they are under threat (remember al-Taqiyya?). In other words, all Muslims are capable and permitted by their holy writ to wage jihad and are expected to. The question is: Are they being obedient to the murderous decrees of Allah and obedient to the murderous character of Muhammad that all Muslims are called to emulate? Remember, the Qur’an and Hadith are filled with contradictory/dualistic statements of jihad and peace. That peace is defined by Islam…which is only directed at Muslims. Kafir must submit or convert…or be subject to death.

When jihad happens such as the 9/ 11 or the Paris massacre, Muslims say, “Oh, that is not the real Islam”. But it is. “Moderates” will not protest, merely deny. Why don’t they protest against the Medinan Muslims, the jihadists? Because they are outranked in order of submission. The Medinan Qur’an that celebrates war and political power is higher and more powerful than the Meccan Qur’an in terms of authority in Islam.

What is peace in Islam? Peace in Islam comes only after you have submitted to Islam. The submission can be brought about by jihad. So here we have again the Qur’an of Mecca (the peaceful religious portion) covering the Qur’an of Medina (the violent political portion). Our common westernized Christian understanding of the word peace misleads us here. It hides the fact that jihad can be used to achieve Islamic peace. It is literally George Orwell's 1984 slogan: WAR IS PEACE. You will submit, one way or another. We would like to think that everyone can peacefully, but Islam does not work like that. Islam demands submission. There is simply no compromise between a system that wants to use the Golden Rule /democracy and a supremacist system which says that everyone has to submit.

Dhimmitude is a concept unique to Islam but similar to the caste system in India. It is governed by submission through fear and dominance. It is a form of semi-slavery so that is why I place it here after the posts on slavery and submission. A Dhimmi is a Kafir (infidel) that is allowed to live under Islamic Sharia. Anyone that fashions their behavior around Islam to appease it is also dhimmi. Today we see our politicians, journalists and intellectuals play the role of dhimmis. A dhimmi is what amounts to a semi-slave. First enslaved mentally to sharia, then physically. They are firstly taxed into submission. A dhimmi was not really a free person under sharia. In another sense a church couldn’t ring its bells because bells are a sign of Satan, according to Muhammad. Sharia Law for Dhimmi are appalling because they established a second-class citizenship. The dhimmi did not have civil rights regardless of skin color. A dhimmi couldn’t prosecute a crime against a Muslim.

In a recent 20th century incident in Turkey...

When Smyrna, the last of the seven churches of Asia was destroyed in 1922, it was not done with the military. Rioting Muslims did it (Smyrna Massacre of 1922). Riots are also a form of jihad. It was known as the Armenian/Pontic genocide and was the systematic ethnic cleansing of the Christian Ottoman Greek population from its historic homeland in Anatolia. Estimates are that up top 1,000,000 were murdered by the Ottoman Empire, Turkish National Movement…what were considered “moderate Muslims."

Dhimmitude, which is the mind of the dhimmi, destroys the civilization because the only way out is by giving up all of your old culture and taking on Islamic philosophies. Here is the abbreviated version: Islam seeks to annihilate all other cultures by dhimmi laws that come out of the Sharia law. The lack of civil rights, abuse, humiliation and oppressive tax burden wears away the spirit to resist becoming Islamic. Dhimmi get new names and names of cities change and then the cultural history vanishes. Once a nation has been fully Islamisized, all of its history disappears. The culture of the Greeks in Anatolia was destroyed by 1922-23. In Pakistan, a Muslim country, the native culture was Hindu. Afghanistan was a Buddhist culture that has since been completely annihilated and replaced by the Taliban and others.

A Supremist Religion VII: Islam and Slavery

You do not know the history of African slavery if you do not know about Islam’s involvement. It is impossible to study the history of Muhammad and Islam and not understand slavery is integral to Islam. Some people think that slavery only happened when white men showed up in ships off the coast of Africa, captured slaves and brought them to America. To only see this piece is to see only a portion of slavery. Islam has 40 different words in their holy writ for slave. Why would the Arabic language have over forty words for slave? They would have 40 or more words for slavery because it is critical to their religion/politics.

White man’s involvement with slavery does involve him showing up on the coast of Africa in a ship to get slaves. That is only half the story though. In reality white man left with his slaves purchased from Muslim slave traders. The Muslims had been trading and capturing slaves in Africa since before Muhammad. White men only represented the newest market. In reality the ideal Muslim views himself as a slave of Allah. As a matter of fact, this is reflected in one of many Muslim names…Abdullah. Abd means slave and Allah - Slave of Allah. The truth is that slavery and subjugation holds a high position in the Islamic mentality.

The Qur’an is very clear about slavery. It’s quite desirable and it has only one limitation: You cannot enslave Muslims. Only Kafir (nonbelievers) can be enslaved. Often the full history of slavery is not taught in the United States. Nor is it easy to find textbooks written that include the full truth. That truth is horrible. Out of the approx. 25 million slaves that were taken out of Africa, 11 million were sold in the Americas. The other 14 million were sold in West/North Africa and southern Europe, where Islam is dominate. By the numbers, for every single slave captured, the slavers had to kill in a 10:1-5:1 ratio.

Sources vary but according to some of those who visited Africa during the peak slave trading days said that there was (conservatively) a 5:1 death ratio for one slave in the wholesale market. In other words, for the 25 million enslaved ten times as many died. That means conservatively 100 million Africans killed to acquire the body of slaves that survived. Worst case scenario 200,000,000+ (and that is just the African totals, not other people’s too). That is a deplorable and murderous statistic and says a lot about the value placed on human life by Islam. Many of the slaves were wholesaled to raise money for jihad. I suppose it is not surprising that that for centuries Islam has been involved in slavery. Allah likes a slave and Allah clearly wants Muslims to enslave others. I’m guessing it is because after keeping slaves long enough, they will convert to Islam and if they don’t, then their children will. Slavery cannot be removed from the Islamic doctrine because Islamic doctrine is eternal. It’s permanent. You cannot change a zebra’s stripes.

Let us be very clear on another fact also. Islam subjugates all non-Muslims. It will just as soon enslave and murder Buddhist, Hindus and Sikhs as it will Christians and Jews. There is no COEXIST in unity with Islam, Their holy writ will not allow it. As a matter of fact history again proves this out. Afghanistan used to be primarily Buddhist until the 10th century when Islam infiltrated. These areas are now primarily Islamic. As a matter of fact, some of the Buddhist statues of antiquity have recently been destroyed by the Taliban.

A Supremist Religion VI: Islam's Persecution of Non-Muslims

It can be distilled down to one statement: 

If you ain't Muslim you ain't anything. At least not fully human. You're therefore not worthy of Muslim sympathy of treatment in equality with Muslims. There is no equality in Islam if you are not Islamic. You're worthy of only death if you do not submit.

Although the Islamic persecution of Jews and other religions has been horrid, I will mainly focus on the Christian persecution because both Jews and Christians have gotten the brunt of the violence that emanates from the Qur’an, Hadith and Sira. When Muhammad had his first vision, which no one else saw, and when he heard the voices, he said they were the voice was of the Angel Gabriel. This is important because Gabriel is in the Judeo-Christian tradition. It is borrowed. From the beginning Muhammad said that his authenticity rested on the fact that he had the same basis as the prophets in the Old Testament (thus sayeth the Lord). The characters were the same but the stories were wrong. If there had been Jews in Mecca they, would have said: “That’s not the way this story really happened.” The Qur’an claims the stories in the Old Testament have been corrupted.

In truth, one of the main reasons I wished to write about Islam is to have people understand the absurdity of the religious/political system that is Islam and then give a better option in the truth of the Christian Gospel. In this post I begin to turn that page. The truth is that Islam has two views of Christians/Jews (duality again). The first view is that Christianity and Islam are brother religions. The second view is that Christians must change their religion to meet the demands of Islam. Modern Christians want to believe that there is a bridge between Islam and Christianity. But the history of Islam shows that Islam first deceives and then annihilates Christianity. Wherever true Islam becomes dominate, Christian and all non-believers end up suffering death or oppression. When Islam takes over an area all of the culture, laws and politics becomes Islamic (Sharia). A Dhimmi, Kafir (nonbeliever, infidel) has to pay a tax, the Jizya. Half of everything they earned is paid to Islam.

Whenever the issue of Islamic persecution comes up, apologists of Islam are quick to state that Christians and Muslims worship the same God (Abrahamic God). That sounds like a good commonality to get started but this is just not true. Since many don’t know any better about Islam’s Allah and the God of the Bible most are accepting of this fallacy. Islam will say they honor Jesus because Jesus was a prophet of Allah, Jesus was a Muslim. They will also say that Jesus was not the Son of God, merely a Prophet. They’ll tell you that the Apostles of Christ were Muslims. They’ll state that Jesus was not crucified, therefore was not resurrected. They’ll state that Trinity is an affront to Allah. They’ll claim Allah is the only one true God and that the Trinity makes Christians polytheist. Islam will say that the New Testament was a corrupt document. In particular, the reason that the New Testament was wrong was that the prophet of Allah, Jesus’ chief prophecy was that after him would come the final prophet and his name would be Ahmed (Muhammad).

A Supremist Religion V: In Islam Women Are Inferior

The dualism of Islam allows for two ways to treat women. They can be honored or they can be beaten. If you’re going to study Islam you have to study women as a separate category because Muhammad had a misogynistic love/hate relationship with them. The reason for this is simple, Islamic doctrine denies that men and women are equal. Men are greater than women. The Qur’an has entire sections devoted to how women are treated inferior to men (too many to note here). On the subject of wife beating, the Qur’an is clear. It says that if a woman does not obey her husband or submit she can be beaten. Some argue that since Islamic women are beaten from an early age, by the time they are married they are used to this treatment and it does not seem to bother them. Wife beating is thoroughly entrenched in Islam. This is not a religious aberration in Islam, it is fundamental to their doctrine.

Muhammad left a great deal of information about the thrashing of women. In a hadith Muhammad is noted as saying that if hitting a woman is necessary do not strike them in the face (unsightly and unbecoming). Because Islam’s holy books are dualistic they hold contradictory positions. There are statements that says that it is proper to beat a woman, then somewhere else, in another hadith, Muhammad supposedly says: “Do not strike Allah’s handmaidens.” The truth is there are explicit rules laid out as to the gradation of how the man makes the woman submit and the final stage is a beating/thrashing. It is a form dominance through progressive punishment

Then there are child marriages and the rape of children. In 2002, research in refugee camps in Afghanistan and Pakistan found that half the girls were married by age 13 [“Violent Oppression of Women in Islam”, Spencer and Chesler, Frontpage Magazine, pg. 15.] In an Afghan refugee camp more than two out of three second grade girls were either married or engaged. Virtually all the girls who were beyond second grade were already married. This is pure Sunna or the way of Muhammad. How do we know this? When Muhammad was in his mid-fifties, he was engaged to Aisha, a child of six. At age nine he consummated the marriage with her. So, when the 60-year-old Pakistani Muslim is engaged to the 10-year-old it is Sunna, it is the way of Muhammad.

Men are allowed to perform honor killings on women. An honor killing is when a man kills a woman because she has violated his honor. A Muslim male must control the sexuality of the females in his household or he is dishonored. The Qur’an speaks at great length about women’s rights (lack of them). Among them women are to receive half the amount of inheritance of a male. In a court of law it takes testimony of two women to equal testimony of one man. If a woman testifies against a man and he denies the accusation, then the testimony has no weight at all. In Islamic court this makes cases of rape impossible to prove.

Muhammad commented that he had seen Hell and the great majority of its inhabitants were women. Why were they there? They had not fully appreciated their husbands. In the same hadith, it is stated that women were spiritually inferior to men and women are not as intelligent as men. This treatment extents to the afterlife too where men become sexual deviants and women remain subjugated and servants of men.

Then there is the Burqa / head-to-toe covering that often includes the face. Some Islamic women say that it is not really required. Again, we encounter dualism (or contradiction). We know this much: Muhammad made all of his wives wear a veil. So although there is not a universal commandment that says women should wear a burqa, we do know that from other precedents…Muhammad’s life and emulation of it is the highest pinnacle of Islamic behavior. Burqa is therefore expected of obedient Muslims.

Another aspect of Islam is polygamy. The Qur’an is quite clear on polygamy. A man can have up to four wives. There is also the travesty of stoning. Sharia law is very technical about stoning. It even denotes the stones should to be chosen so they do not kill immediately. They have to be big enough so that when enough of them are thrown, they will kill the victim. Death by stoning is meant to be a torture that the entire community participates in.

A Supremist Religion IV: Jihad on the US Education System

As we quickly approach the 20^th anniversary of the attacks of 9/11 we need to realize something peculiar and patterned about that attack. The Sept 11, 2001 attacks followed Muhammad’s pattern for Jihad in that it was a premeditated sneak attack (Guerilla-type warfare). Before Muhammad there had been Arabian established rules of war. But when Muhammad developed jihad he threw out all the rules in favor of offensive Guerilla warfare. Brother could now kill brother, father could kill son and tribe member would go to war against another tribe.

Islam will always claim a “defensive” attack in the Muslims mind. They are protecting their way of life. They view themselves victims of circumstance. This mindset is often employed by the Palestinians in Israel. According to most devout Imam, September 11 was a defensive attack. All jihad is considered defensive because the Kafir (infidel) creates the first offense by denying Muhammad. So the Kafir has already offended Allah. Logically it is a no-win situation for a Kafir. Therefore, what follows the offense is a defensive attack. If it were not for the Kafir there would be no jihad. The Kafir are to blame, there are virtually no exception. Therefore until all are converted to Islam and submission to Allah, jihad is considered perpetual and is incumbent upon all Muslims to perform. If a Muslim is not willing to perform jihad, they are Kafir. There is no middle ground or “moderate” position. Jihad is not to cease until the last Kafir has submitted. As long as there are Kafirs there will be jihad.

Interestingly, not all jihad comes as C4 strapped to someone’s waist. The biggest jihad happening in America today is practiced by Saudi Arabia and other Middle East countries. And they’re not using the sword, they’re using the dollars we pay them for oil. The most problematic jihad though is the money funneled into special interest politics. Washington, D.C. is awash in money from the Middle East and this money is used to influence votes, influence people and launch political campaigns. The most powerful jihad is the Islamification of our education, political and judicial systems.

One of the primary places that Muslims use money to advance jihad is in educational systems. The Saudis have pumped in enormous amounts of money into our universities. The Middle East history departments and Arabic department's textbooks teach a sanitized version of Islam in schools. In many cases the Islam that is studied in our schools is a glorified religion, not a glorified political system. No mention is ever made of nearly 300 million Kafir deaths since Islam’s inception. There is usually no mention of the dhimmitude or a Kafir as slave. Very little attention is brought to shine on Islam’s role in the African American slave trade either (a later post). On the issue of slavery it needs to be understood that nearly every single African slave that was sold to the white man was bought from a Muslim wholesaler.

While on the topic of slavery it should be noted that Islam as a politic has a political status for the Christians called dhimmi (another later post). When Islam takes over a governmental situation it implements Sharia law. How Christians and Jews end up being treated in Islamic courts is awful. Dhimmi have no civil rights like slaves. So this history of dhimmitude and special taxes that Christians had to pay was in essence taxed slavery.

So why isn’t much of Islamic history taught and thoroughly examined in schools? Some do but many do not. Why? I am guessing based on reading it is because their history is not glorified but instead...morbid and murderous. It is graphic like the images we see from ISIS. One of the main reasons that even Christians don’t teach the history of Christianity and Islam is the history is so dreadful, frankly a lot of it is horrid and disgusting. We see some of it in the censored videos online. For Christian’s who attempt to stay chaise and pure, discussion of khafḍ (female genital mutilation) in a classroom setting is, well, unsettling. Are Christian’s angels? No. they're not BUT... Islam’s history is often that HORRENDOUS. To understand true Islam, true history needs to be studied. This dreadful history continues until today. We see it in the 9/11 attacks, Paris, the poor treatment of Jews worldwide and the blatant and horrible persecution of Christians in the Middle East.

A Supremist Religion III: Jihad, the Little Engine That Shouldn't

It is pretty much this simple. This is not a generalization. Islam literally means “submit.” Jihad was Muhammad’s greatest invention for the propagation of Islamic philosophy. Islam is based upon complete submission to the laws of Islam in every area of life, private and public. This is Sharia Law. Sharia Law is essentially the example of Muhammad, made into law. Islam also teaches that those who are not currently Muslims must be brought into submission as well. While this sometimes occurs through conversion, it more often takes place through acts of violence. This violence is most often jihad.

Islam’s definition of jihad is, “…to war against on-Muslims, and is etymologically derived from the word Mujahada, signifying warfare to establish the religion.” (Reliance of the Traveler, pg. 599). Jihad is obligatory for all Muslims. (et al pg. 600-602). Jihad simply emulates the way of Muhammad who said, “I have been commanded to fight people until they testify that there is no god but Allah, and perform the prayer, and pay zakat. If they say it, they have saved their blood and possessions from me…” Jihad is also commanded in the Qur’an. “Fighting is prescribed for you.” (Qur’an Surah 2:216) “Slay them wherever you find them.” (Qur’an Surah 4.89) “Fight the idolaters (Kafir) utterly.” (Qur’an Surah 9:36).

Jihad makes up a large portion of the Islamic holy writings: Meccan Qur’an: 0%, Medina Qur’an: 24%, Sira (Biography of Muhammad): 67%, Hadith (Traditions of Muhammad): 21%, Overall: 31% of Islam’s holy writings is dedicated to jihad and violence. According to its most central teachings, true Muslim people cannot live in peace with their neighbors. It is quite plainly against their religion in their very own sacred texts.

As I’ve said before, Islam is a machine that runs on an engine powered by jihad. It is literally a train that runs on terror or a Terror Train. Jihad can come in many different guises, not just violence…and this is where Islam gets tricky…and deceptive. Jihad does not mean holy war (it can include holy war). Jihad actually means “struggle”. It includes much more than war and violence. Jihad can be done with words, a pen, money and courts. The Qur’an lays out the vision of jihad. The Sira (Muhammad’s biography) lays out the strategies of jihad. The hadith (traditions) give us the warlike tactics. Again, all modeled upon Muhammad, because Muhammad is the only perfect Muslim and jihadist. Jihad takes up about two-thirds of the Sira. There was only a nine-year period in which Muhammad pursued intense jihad, but the number of pages that are devoted to it gives you an idea of how important it was to the spread of Islam. It is critical to note that Islam/Muhammad did not succeed until he turned to jihad. It’s obvious then why Muslims would look to jihad as their most useful stratagem.

I know many have heard Muslims say, “The real jihad is inner struggle, the spiritual struggle.” That is the Greater Jihad. The jihad of the sword and war is the Lesser Jihad. But the hadith tell us about the greater jihad— the inner spiritual struggle. By the numbers only approx. 2% of the hadith are devoted to this kind of struggle. The other 98% are about enslaving, taxing or killing the Kafir. Notice again we have a duality. There are two ways to view jihad. A Muslim may choose whichever he needs for the moment when practicing al-Taqiyya during a time of eminent danger (which could be jihad). Their beliefs literally allow them to use circular reasoning in these instances. Present a dual way of thinking. If under threat claim the peaceful option to gain strategic advantage and then switch back to violent methods claiming they were under threat.

The most prominent example of modern jihad is 9/11, African bombings and Paris shootings. All these are patterned after Muhammad. Muslims claimed “We are the religion of peace.” The veil of the religion of Islam was used to hide the political act of jihad. This has been done before as well. Muhammad always covered his political actions with a religious necessity.  Additionally, the World Trade Center was targeted specifically as a business center. It was the hope of Al Qaeda that destroying the WTC would paralyze the American economy. Jihad wherever possible is a political/economic attack. Similarly Muhammad’s attacks on the caravans were to gain wealth for himself and to remove wealth from the Kafirs.

A Supremist Religion II: Muhammad The Bad Neighbor

Muhammad believed and acted as if there was a duality in reality. What do I mean? In a figurative sense there are two Muhammad’s. There is the religious preacher Muhammad (the younger more peaceful one), and there is the warrior-politician Muhammad (the violent murderous thug). Duality is one of the things that is confusing about Islam even to those who study it. It always has two messages to preach, and the reason it has two messages to preach is that there are two Muhammad. One that was dominant during the Meccan years of the Qur'an (the young peaceful portion) and one that was dominant in the later years of Muhammad's life after the Haj in Medina (old murderous thug). 

More than that, when you read the Qur'an, it’s clear there are two Qur'ans because they were written over a 23 year period and during Muhammad's life he became more murderous. One Qur'an is religious (early), the other Qur'an is political/murderous (later); both are combined in the Qur'an you buy at Amazon. Muhammad the religious man was not much of a success at all, but Muhammad the political man, and the warrior, was overwhelmingly successful. The truth of Muhammad's legacy is this. In the last nine years of his life he averaged an event of violence every six weeks. By this process of constant warfare he became the first ruler of all of Arabia.

Muhammad did not get along well with his neighbors. Even in his early religious phase, he was pushy and aggressive. When he went to Medina, his behavior became 10 times worse. When he eventually began to settle in Medina, approximately half the town was Jewish. Within three years after he arrived, all the Jews were eradicated. They had been either driven out of Medina— after their money was taken— or they’d been killed and sold into slavery.

Before Muhammad died, he had struck out to the north to Syria to fight the Christians. Some of his dying words were: “Let there be neither Jew nor Christian left in Arabia.” He would often attack neighboring tribes and attempt to force them to submit to Allah (himself). When they’d refuse, he would often kill the male members until the rest surrendered and then they were given a choice to convert. If they didn’t, they were killed or sold into slavery. Women, children, men. This was profitable enterprise for him. Jihad was profitable. 

He used jihad to finance more jihad. Muhammad came up with a way to make religion and politics pay. You still see the fruits of that philosophy today in modern Jihad. What we see is that in Islamic philosophy, Jihad not only supposedly helps the believer in the afterlife, it helps their families now in this life because the families are rewarded for the suicide bombings performed on behalf of other family members.

A Supremist Religion I: Importance of Muhammad in Islam

I have run through my series about Islam twice on my Facebook page and it has had an extraordinary impact on those that read it. Now that I have time to pick up the reins of my blog again after an extended lay-off from writing I have chosen to repost the entire series here also. I do so because other than sexual immorality and what amounts to a hostile take over by homosexuality and transgenderism in society, Islam is the largest threat to Christianity, western culture and the American way of life now that Afghanistan has been turned back over to Islamic Terrorists and their Chinese backers. So I begin where I've begun twice before...at lesson number one...

Most non-Muslims think that you become a Muslim by worshiping Allah, but this is not true. You can worship the God Allah and still not be a Muslim. What it takes to be a Muslim is to worship Allah...exactly like Muhammad did. We know exactly how he worshiped his God because it was recorded in the Sira and Hadith(s). He inevitably was murderous and easily angered. That is why the hot-tempered nature of the Muslim adherent. So when you see a Muslim who is quick to anger, he is simply imitating Muhammad his spiritual icon (Proverbs 29:11, Ecclesiastes 7:9, James 1:19-20). If historical biographies are even remotely accurate, the prophet was a demonic ill-tempered thug. There is not a true Muslim alive that does not know a detailed history of Muhammad.

People that only understand the Qur'an without knowing other aspects and supporting documentation are only seeing the tip of the iceberg. What lies beneath is vastly more dangerous than what is currently being seen. That is because, like icebergs, there are two aspects to Islam and the more powerful and pervasive of the two is out of sight 99% of the time in the culture and on the world stage. We begin to get a hint of it though in lands where ISIS resides and were Sharia Law has been instituted as the Lex Terrae. Just as we will now see Afghanistan sink back into. A demonic breeding ground of killing and training of killers. With 83 Billion of American weaponry too no less. A Islam militant cesspool. More on this in later posts. One of the things I will also do this time around is to deposit Scripture passages in relevant places to offset what is clearly not scriptural and often times is just plain evil. Mostly to show the contrast between what is right an what is clearly wrong with Islam and our Western thinking and understanding of it.

The Sequence of Reality

The universe, creation, contrary to atheistic statements is not just the sum result of random chance and time. They want you to believe this lie so you will keep them company in godless nihilistic misery. A reality that effectively has no purpose, no real meaning, no goal. Just the result of pure chance. No morality. No absolutes. No value.

“In the beginning was the word…”, according to John 1:1. The word or specifically…information. Design. Intent. Intelligence. Mind. Sentience. God.

Due to knowledge gained in genetics, biology has become information science, a subject of messages, instructions and code. Genes contain information and enable procedures for reading it in and writing it. Life spreads by network. The body itself is an information processor. Our relationships are ethernet or Wifi. Memory resides not just in brains but in every cell. DNA is the information repeated a trillion times in perfect copy. The most advanced message processor in the universe —an alphabet, a code, 6 billion bits to form a human being. The pinnacle of creation. Another sentient being. What lies at the heart of every living thing is not a fire. No, what lies at the base level is information. Designed information that can create information against the natural flow of entropy/chaos. Information, biological words, instructions. If you want to understand life, don’t think about vibrant liquids, cells, think about information theory.

In physics when photons, electrons, atoms interact, what are they really doing? Exchanging bits, transmitting quantum states, exchanging information. The laws of physics are in essence algorithms. Engines of reality. Every burning star, every particle leaving its ghostly trace in a chamber is information. Intelligence. The universe computes its own destiny. When heating water, the heat source is signaling the water to move faster by transmitting energy from source to receiver. What’s really fundamentally occurring is a transfer of information.

We now realize that information may be primarily more fundamental than matter or even life itself. It is now possible to see the byte/bit as the irreducible kernel of existence. Information forms the core of existence. The outcome of experiments themselves are affected, or even determined, when it is observed (Schrodinger's Cat). Not only is the observer observing, they're asking questions, make statements that are ultimately expressed in discrete bits. Reality arises in the last analysis from the posing of yes-no questions. Binary on or off scenarios.

A living organism’s ability to continue to reproduce offspring, a form of biological perpetual motion leads to the conclusion that there needs to be a supernatural life force working against the natural forces. Why? Entropy. Re-appropriating energy to construction instead of destruction. How does it do this? Through intelligence or transfer of information. Because life is constantly producing order from disorder, in contrast to every other physical process. Entropy is a measure of disorder. Think of it as reality's tax. Left unchecked disorder increases over time. Energy disperses, systems dissolve into chaos. Life…it does just the opposite. More information is created, not destroyed. Counterintuitive. Counter-chaos. It doesn’t balance out in the end equation without information input. Information cannot arise from non-information or non-intelligence. Its impossible.

Scientific Laws of Information (SLI)

SLI1: A material entity can't generate a non-material entity.

SLI2: Universal information is a non-material entity.

SLI3: Universal information can't be made by statistical process.

SLI4: Universal information can only be produced by intelligent sender.

4a: Every code is based upon a mutual 'agreement' or understanding between sender and receiver.

4b: There is no new universal information without an intelligent sender.

4c: Every information transmission chain can be traced back to an intelligent sender.

4d: Attributing meaning to a set of symbols (chemical, electrical, etc.) is an intellectual process requiring intelligence.

Conclusion: Biological information (the fundamental component of life) originates only from an intelligent sender and all theories of chemical and biological evolution require that information must have originated solely from matter and energy (no sender). Therefore first premise is possible and second premise is not possible.

Citations:

Microsoft Word - DN06 Sections.doc (witpress.com) 

The Gate of Confusion

It should be noted that God divides men at Babel not by race, nor intelligence nor vocation or station in life. He allows their division by language. A unit or commonality to all people. I again believe people are being divided by language. This time much more subtly. Most are speaking English as a universal language but words within English are being bastardized and deliberately confused so that they do not mean the same thing to people in the same society and it is happening quickly. Tolerance, hate, science, infrastructure, terrorist, etc. 

The same errors or sin repeated this time much more subtly and communicated much more efficiently via mass media. The result the same. The confusion that ensues is punishment because no one can communicate properly. People scattering all in their own directions. They splinter and divide. [ I find it interesting that Pentecost or salvation reverses this effect ]. When division starts the kingdom leaves. When division stops unification is possible and the Kingdom returns. Or perhaps it is the Kingdom doing the unifying?

It is further ironic that when one seeks to control another in chattel slavery one of the main things restricted and prevented is the ability of the slave to read and write or communication in an organized, coherent, formal institutionalized way. We saw it in the Dark Ages with the Catholic church and in the Antebellum South in the United States.

It therefore should come as no surprise that the word Babel in Hebrew has two different meanings based on who is using the word. In Hebrew it means 'confusion'. In the tongue of the Babylonians who used the term in their self-identity of Babylon it meant, "gate to God" or essentially 'truth'. The Babylonians are essentially claiming truth or the path to truth... but God is essentially saying, no, you are confusion. Babylon or failure to communicate and division equates today to the things of the world not of God, and are confusion. To those of the world or Babylon although they believe they are the gate to God, truth or the thing that will bring or ring in the unity of the Kingdom of God. Instead they are bringing something wholly other...inferior. Nefarious and godless.

1 Corinthians 14:33 …for God is not a God of confusion but of peace, as in all the churches of the saints.

In 1 Corinthians 14:33 it is translated ἀκαταστασία/akatastasia or confusion and in James it is translated disorder. It is actually a compound Greek word formed from (a) meaning not, (kata) meaning down and (stasis) meaning stand/steady. Together it means "cannot remain steady". It literally means something is unstable or it is an instability brought on by disorder. In the case of Babel not only disorder of language but the disorder of society brought on by the confusion of language unsettles the entirety of the human population. We are seeing the same now. The confusion brought on by the purposeful confusion of language is causing complete societal disorder, division and violence. So why would chaos and confusion reign in Babel and the world today if they are still God's creation under his providence? Because, man has rejected God. The fear of God is the beginning of wisdom but ignoring God and the absence of God is chaos. The world worships a god of confusion but a wise man worships the true God.

Our society prides itself on multiculturalism and unity in diversity. There are many cases where this is a good thing. True diversity is indeed an asset to not only the Body of Christ but also our nation. One man’s weakness can be another man’s strength. Additionally, gasoline in the right environment can make a vehicle go but used incorrectly or with evil intent and it can be used to make a Molotov cocktail. Mixing and using differences can always be used to suit God’s good purposes. Just like anything else that the Devil can counterfeit, it can be used for destructive ends…even subtly as in the manipulation of words. This is where the word diversity and confusion begin to fuse and become almost indistinguishable. It takes a diversity of people mixed chaotically together to cause a confusing uproar. This is not a good diversity.

It is here we see that there are types of melding that just shouldn’t take place. The reason they shouldn’t be mixed is because they cause chaos, not unity. They cause disunity and mayhem. It is the exact idea gleaned from 1 Corinthians 14:33 and the fact that God is not a God of confusion. By removing God from the equation, disorder reigns. The absence of God’s presence allow it to happen. God Himself is order and maintains order. So to remove Him from any given situation is to produce disorder. Remove God and still use the same words and you still get confusion.

The restraint of God’s grace is removed and the sin and evil of man enters in its place like a spiritual vacuum. This is exactly what we see in Babel. It is also what we see today. It is the idea in the word translated uprisings. In the End Times when people ignore or turn away from God…there will be more war, disorder and confusion. Chaos will reign. 

That is why the Apostle Luke says of the End Times: 

“When you hear of wars and uprisings, do not be frightened. These things must happen first, but the end will not come right away. Then he said to them: Nation will rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom. There will be great earthquakes, famines and pestilences in various places, and fearful events and great signs from heaven. Luke 21:9-11

The word uprisings here? You guessed it, it is ἀκαταστασίας/akatastasias again….confusion will reign in the last days. The lord of confusion and division. That is because God will be, for all effective purposes...absent and that will be its own punishment.

The Soul’s Master: Why Marxism Fails

In a sentence Socialism and inevitably Communism manifest the characteristics of chattel slavery. The theory underlying Marxism is a form of spiritual chattel slavery. It makes people property physically and spiritually. It is therefore ironic that those pushing it the hardest are those that speak out so vehemently against racism and the idea that any person should be subjugated or enslaved. Yet this is exactly what they are attempting to foist on the populous and their constituents. That means that (1) They are completely clueless to what they are promulgating or (2) They know exactly what they are doing and should be considered  threats to democracy and a free nation. Marxism promotes slavery of all to all. Government institutionalized and mandated slavery. Slowly the United States is slouching towards this bondage.

As history has shown, communism must either fail utterly or develop itself into a rigid system of slavery. There is no real middle ground here. It’s the myth of that holy grail of the ‘middle ground’ that modern adherents an proponents advertise as its redeeming attributes. The problem is that the middle ground doesn’t exist and nor can it. The progressives in society advocate for its full-blown institution but there ignorance of history and failure to understand true human nature leads them to a false conclusion.

The motives of self-interest and mutual compassion and real equality are discarded. In their place communism proposes that the society shall have all things common, that every person shall labor for the common end. Unfortunately, injustice and unfairness will allow those who do not contribute their share can still draw out a share. They get a portion of the pot even when they don’t deserve anything if they haven’t contributed communally to the pot. At its root these are economic philosophy not political ones. The politic drives the economic philosophy. The economics of course then keep the politics in power.

For Socialism and Communism to work the rule of the commune must literally be, “If any man will not work, neither shall he eat." This class of members, then, must either starve or be compelled to work. As we know this is just not the case as there is literally no incentive to work knowing you could be the one sponging off of the State and on the State’s dole like a financial junkie.

If they are to be compelled to work then by whom, by the community itself? The community is in theory a corporation; it can only act practically upon its members, through its officers. It is a theory of thorough equality. The compulsion which is exercised upon the many must be exercised upon all. The corporation therefore must be absolute in its title to dictate to each member how much labor he shall contribute, in order to be entitled to draw out his share of good. No incentive to work when others don’t contribute and force those that don’t work to work. One person is a slave to the another lazy person and the lazy person a slave to authority forcing their hand.

Once either of these individuals is allowed to decide that question, there will be an end of equity. Both will be resentful. Resent or anger therefore is an end of harmony. An end of harmony and unity of purpose is an end of plenty and ultimately a societal and authoritarian collapse. The bottom-line is that each member must be enslaved to the corporation in some way to make the system work. They must be enslaved to the individuals who wield the official power of the corporation who for all effective purposes stand outside the political system they rule. In essence ideological hypocrites, kleptocrats and slaveholders.

Therefore their political ideologies that they themselves live by can diverge greatly from the system they impose in the enslaved. The proverbial: What is for thee is not for me. Those elitist ideologies can range anywhere from Communism to Muslim caliphate as we see with Bernie Sanders, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Rashida Tlaib and Ilhan Omar. We are already starting to see this dynamic in the political elitists in the Progressive Left and at times even in the elitist right which impose unconstitutional ruling and restraints on the masses through bogus laws. It is literally an institutionalization of socialism/communism through legislation.

In socialism and eventually communism we have a system of slavery far more grinding than the chattel slavery and bondage forced on African Americans in the 19th century. The officials or .01% in charge will capitalize financially whenever possible and live like aristocracy regardless of what they subjugate others with but officially they will own no right of property or their million of slaves. They’ll still have power and direction over them. Having no personal tie to these multitudes or millions will make them detached and callous. No empathy for the slaves in this system. Horrors and terrors will ensue and always have in history where no one is held morally or ethically accountable. In socialism and communism there is no God as they are fundamentally atheistic worldviews. No God no measure of right or wrong. Therefore everything and anything is permissible including wholesale slaughter based on the whims of the State. We saw this in 20th century China and the Soviet Union.

There will be no moral prompting to care for the welfare of slaves in an ethic-less corporate entity. Only profit for the good of the ‘Corporation’ is relevant. If we believe that corporate entities will look to the good or moral end of slaves, consumers or their workers we need only look at things like the tobacco industry or insurance companies. These types of companies are neither affected by affection towards their workers only their own self-interests which are primarily existence and that is driven by profit from labor. Cheaper the better, meaning the standard of living by default diminishes to a level playing field regardless of effort. Again we see no incentive to work hard or work at all.

In truth, in order to keep a civil government just and free, it should be endowed with as few powers and functions as possible. The ones that it should have are mostly, those regulations and law which are necessary to maintain social order and relative justice. All the other functions of civilized life should be left as much as possible to the individual and the family. Instead we have seen an overt invasion into people’s personal lives over the last 2 years due to COVID-19 and elected officials overstepp9ng their Constitutional authority and most of the courts are allowing it including the United States Supreme Court which is specifically in place to prevent a breach of the Constitutional contract with the American public.

An overbearing doting paternal government can never remain a free government. By directly imposing itself into so many powers and interests, it draws into its control too much influence to effect outcomes…including elections if people are not precautious. When this happens there are to many possibilities the institutionalized of the process to kept control of positions of power come to the advantage of those already in power. In other words, it becomes a de facto hostile takeover. Too many prizes prove to be too irresistible to overcome and those chosen quickly become those self-appointed. We move from inaugurations to coronations. It is human nature and that is why Socialism and Communism never work. The .01% become corrupted. It happens every single time in history and has never been any different. The success rate of diplomatic and democratic rule by an isolated few is 0%. Selfishness, ambition, greed and avarice always prove to great to overcome. Socialism and communism implode due to human foibles not due to theory. The theory is sound but the instigators and propagators of it are not. If we are honest, we would understand that Kingdom if God is a benevolent dictatorship/totalitarians state (Jesus). As long as man is in charge it fails. If God is in charge it succeeds...theocracy. That doesn't happen though until Thy Kingdom Come. Until then democracy is the best opinion if Jesus isn't actively leading everyone's hearts.

Due to human foibles, selfishness and ambition, socialism and communism corrupts and implodes from within. Due to human nature it distorts into numberless alternates, and becomes a gigantic engine of oppression to the people, under the pretence of paternity. The old joke being: “We’re the government, we’re here to help.” No, they’re only here to acquire more control. We only need look to the False Church and the myriad of breakaway denominations within the false churches. In particular, Liberation Theology and its subordinate theologies like Social Justice, Black theology and Queer theology for instance, Once the main branch diverges from truth…everything under it follows. So too economic and political theories.

Communism trajectory forces it to travel in a direction exactly opposite to this maxim of true and free statesmanship. That is because Communism trajectory forces it to travel in a direction exactly opposite God and Scripture. These false economic theories often misunderstand as political theories seek to replace the Kingdom of God with the Kingdom of Man without God. The theory believes that the Commonwealth of the State deserves all the indivudlas and resources of that State. It doesn’t just ask for the human and material resources but also the services and functions. Everything becomes universally the State. Your children are the State’s. Your futures, the State’s.The State therefore becomes the sole property owner, sole employer, sole overseer, sole slaveholder, sole distributer, sole family ruler, sole master and soul master. The State is God.

The corruption and vice, the cliques, the factions, the official employment and office-seeking will devolve into a form of sycophancy by individual and corporation alike. Those that do no align to the party ideology will be the oppressed. But wait…isn’t that what we are beginning to see in America now? Corruption pervades the highest offices of the land. We see shameless self-promotion to maintain offices by both Republicans and Democrats. There is a slave like sycophancy by the media that is more and more being controlled ideologically by one party or another? There is more of a prevalence to not only malign, slander or libel and opposing view but now an actual desire to punish dissenting view or literally attack and silence it?

Who would wish grow up in society under these extreme conditions? I believe the answer is self-evident and is already happening. The result would be the most iniquitous and cruel slavery ever witnessed on earth. Those that become the successful demagogues would be the masters, their subservient office-holders (the ideologically identical) in the States would be the slave-drivers, and the citizens would be the slaves regardless of race. The controlling State would justify that the Marxist theory would work based on smaller older successful communes among us by no means enslave their members; but whenever these deem the terms and rules of the society unsuitable, they are left free to withdraw.

We see this in religious cults such as the Amish and Mennotite traditions to a greater or lesser degree. Granted there are always attempts in these type of isolated religious communities at ‘guilting’ people into behavior to control them but there is always the option to leave even though it essentially means a form of anathema or excommunication. In a socialist or communist nation…there will be no escape hatch like this. Ask the former Soviet Union or Communist China. Had there been no Western world after the fall of the Berlin Wall where would these ‘escapees’ from Communism to go? They had America. What is America turns to full blown socialism or communism. Where do American’s go if we seed the rest of the world with this slavery?

The truth is that Social and later Communism seeks to make itself universal. It aims to possess all of the commonwealth, and to own all the citizens. The world inevitably can become the realm of the State. What if there are then no more alternatives to escape this philosophy? We then see a One World Government. A world ruled by and elitist, non-empathetic, power-hungry corporation. The only alternative to this slavery is absolute poverty outside the system with that system always seeking to assimilate you into it. Slavery or always on the lamb to avoid being controlled…a penalty or discontent only slightly less severe than that of crucifixion inflicted by pagan masters on slaves in the past. To either become part of the godless collective as a faceless entity or forever be viewed as a criminal at risk of persecution for not conforming. How is this any different than the persecution of the 1st century Christians? What should a Christian rightfully do? I think you know the answer. A man cannot serve two masters, only the Soul’s Master.

 

Hatebox: The Best Revenge is to Forgive

We have a duty to forgive others. In truth we have a duty to forgive ourselves too as wrongs that remain unforgiven only work to destroy us inside. Resentment, the emotion which opposes forgiveness, was given to us by God but when we can’t let it go we misuse that emotion for purposes it wasn’t meant for. When we don't forgive we turn our heart into a hatebox that accumulates wrongs. Resentment has a legitimate scope but not to the extent that it turns to sin. 

Jesus told us: Matthew 5:22-24 “But I say to you that everyone who is angry with his brother will be liable to judgment; whoever insults his brother will be liable to the council; and whoever says, ‘You fool!’ will be liable to the hell of fire. So if you are offering your gift at the altar and there remember that your brother has something against you, leave your gift there before the altar and go. First be reconciled to your brother, and then come and offer your gift.

The conditionality is that we seek to be reconciled. That we ourselves forgive. Resentment or anger per se is not a sin. God knew we’d get angry about things. We just need restraint and not allow it to mutate into sin. 

Paul said: Ephesians 4:26-27 Be angry and do not sin; do not let the sun go down on your anger, and give no opportunity to the devil.

When I looked long and hard at my periods of unforgiveness and resentment I realized they were reactions against injustice, and not against mere pain. Anger is in fact a legitimate moral emotion as a reaction to inequality. God did not expect us to be unfeeling drones. When I looked even deeper I realized my resent over the injustice didn’t arise against the one who unintentionally hurts me but rather the unfeeling act perpetrated on me. I’ve learned not to attribute to malice that which can be explained by ignorance which is 95% of the time. So to remain angry at the person is pointless. Most people are oblivious of sins of omission…hence the word omission. They’re blissfully unaware.

Unfortunately anger is an emotion which prompts instantly to confrontation. It prompts first to reaction rather than thought. Then actions come, usually bad ones. We act on impulse imprudently. It's an issue of lack of control. Through our lives anger was a series of cause and effect with no pause after the cause. I believe this reaction is imprinted in us from birth or at least from a very young age. Anger is the natural reaction to attack or insult as a self-defense. I am certain God implanted this in us. To become angry is not sin as it is an emotion from God for a practical purpose. I mean, look around, we live in a world full of aggressors. This is especially true for a Christian who is a person that believes in God….whom the world hates. Therefore anger is legitimate response.

Paul says be angry and sin not. We need to also realize that Christ’s perfect holiness did not forbid His being angry.

Mark 11:15 Then they came to Jerusalem. And He entered the temple and began to drive out those who were buying and selling in the temple, and overturned the tables of the money changers and the seats of those who were selling doves…

As a balanced emotional person it is expected you will feel happiness AND anger. If not you are unbalanced and immoral as these emotions are a sign of balanced morality. Anger stirred by resentment of unrighteous acts is normal. If you don’t have anger in situations that demand them you are likely incapable of seeing the world properly through a Biblical lens. Therefore at the heart of the issue is spiritual immorality or sin. We all know people that take great joy in being miserable all the time. This is an immorality and immaturity issue. To not control anger that leads to retaliation is to remain a child. When we become adults we are to put away childish things.

If we are the type of people to say that our indignation only arises when we see our neighbor’s doing wrong, not ourselves, then we are being hypocritical. We are deceiving ourselves in denial of our own sin. Sadly many Christians do this and are roundly hated for it. They see the speck in their neighbor’s eye and gleefully point it out while ignoring the plank in their own. If we only anger seeing the bad actions of others and then not forgive we become the object of the wrong instead of our neighbor because of our unforgiving attitude and hypocrisy…we are just as guilty.

The Bible requires you to love your neighbor as yourself, not more than yourself. People who overreact to the wrongs done to them while ignoring their own behavior are people who do not know themselves or don’t take honest stock of themselves. These people tend to be the most vindictive of all. We need only look at the Sadducees and Pharisees of Jesus’ time. Their anger was the most volatile for a wrong perceived and the most vindictive to retaliate. It’s the retaliation that is the sin not the anger. The Mark 3 passage illustrates this clearly as it contrasts Jesus’ anger against the Pharisees.

Mark 3:1-6 Another time Jesus went into the synagogue, and a man with a shriveled hand was there. Some of them were looking for a reason to accuse Jesus, so they watched him closely to see if he would heal him on the Sabbath. Jesus said to the man with the shriveled hand, “Stand up in front of everyone.” Then Jesus asked them, “Which is lawful on the Sabbath: to do good or to do evil, to save life or to kill?” But they remained silent. He looked around at them in anger and, deeply distressed at their stubborn hearts, said to the man, “Stretch out your hand.” He stretched it out, and his hand was completely restored. Then the Pharisees went out and began to plot with the Herodians how they might kill Jesus.

If we look at this scenario from both sides we see that the resentment Jesus manifested is in defense of the purpose of the Law which in itself is a ‘self-defense’ as the Law is God. The moment the Pharisees/Herodians seek retribution it erupts into full-blown sin. Jesus immediately moves on to other miracles (and the crowds follow) but the religious leaders leave disgruntled and intent on murder.

So perhaps you were wronged and the wrong was properly punished. Your resentment and anger must then stop too. You must be restored to former relationship prior to the wrong not continue to harbor resent. You must move back to: Love your neighbor as yourself. It doesn’t mean the person who wronged you was innocent nor does it mean they changed…it just means they stopped the unrighteous behavior and you forgave. The change doesn’t just stop with their ceasing of wrong-doing but your willingness to forgive and overlook it moving forward. Forgiveness manifests the mercy and grace of those wronged. If we refused to forgive because we are wronged by sin there would never be any forgiveness since we’re all sinners and constantly sinning against not only one another but to God. Yet God is/was willing to forgive us. A forgiveness without which, we're doomed. There will be times when forgiveness is the only valid option. 

Let he that is without sin cast the first stone…otherwise...forgive.

Therefore we love others even when we don't want to. Even love our enemies that wronged us. Except of course in those tenuous situations of self-defense where anger is a protective measure defending righteousness or that which is good. We’re Christians not doormats. Love is obligatory. We must love our neighbors and our enemies. Loving them means forgiving them for an affront that was remediated or made right. We don’t necessarily need to like enemies but we do need to love them. Sometimes that means praying for their own stupidity and pointless attacks on us. Just remember though that true forgiveness expects a change in behavior. Forgiveness that doesn’t expect a change is only enablement.

That means real forgiveness at its root…is to choose not to retaliate or suppress the sinful urge to attack. A forgiving person will not return wrong for wrong (lex talionis). Instead of returning hatred, returning compassion and kindness even when it doesn't appear warranted. Please note though that our duty to forgive is not grounded in the belief that unjust hostility and violence deserve no retribution. They do deserve it by their strict moral desert. It is God though that is the judge and punisher. Vengeance is the mine says the Lord. The duty of forgiveness is for us but the actually ability to forgive is God’s alone. We merely assume an act of love in God’s stead so we can ultimately open a door for His providence. The ability to act in grace and forgive is delegated from God through us to the transgressor. Why? All sin is against God, not us.

Loving one’s enemy therefore aims to minimize natural evil and provides no higher calls for retribution. Sin and suffering stop at forgiveness’s doorstep and cannot enter to wreak havoc in love's household. We have the ability to stand in that doorway and refuse sin's entry. We have the ability to turn away hostility before it even enters our lives. 

We have a duty to God, to those we love and our neighbor to protect them from this. Yes, we even have a duty to protect enemies. Do unto others as you’d have done to you. In this way we begin to repair broken and hateful relationships. In this way we repair broken hateful societies. It really is about forgiveness and it’s not really a request, it’s a responsibility to God and man. Forgiveness sets a slave free and that slave is you. It is the entire story of the Cross.

Matthew 6:12 …and forgive us our trespasses, as we forgive them that trespass against us.

Out of Control: Mastering Unbridled Passions

I am examining why America appears to be getting more chaotic. I thought when I began this series it would lead to complex mysterious causes. What I have found is that all roads lead to the same root cause. On these roads are quite a few Biblical road signs that are posted as warnings. Until now most have been ignored. Why? Because the signs being placed are being placed for a people who ignore God. They don't recognize the signs as warnings. Why would they pay attention to His signs? This was God's pattern throughout Scripture: Warning, judgment, punishment, correction. We're ignoring the warnings and speeding headlong into judgment.

As the mind leads, the body follows. As the individual hearts go...so goes a nation. A mind for God follows God. A mind for the world follows the world. God is immutable, measured and certain. The world is inconsistent, maddening and chaotic.

Proverbs 14:30 A tranquil heart is life to the body, but passion is rottenness to the bone.

Proverbs 16:32 He who is slow to anger is better than the mighty, and he who rules his spirit, than he who captures a city.

Proverbs 29:11 A fool always loses his temper, but a wise man holds it back.

As most know about me I have always said that, “I don’t care what you feel until I know what you think.” What I mean by this is that until I run what you say through a filter of Scriptural principles everything you’ve felt is subjective and therefore prone to error. Especially prone to the potential error against the principles that underlie and are commanded by Scripture. Men’s hearts are enmity against God. It is safe to assume that more often than not what man feels is usually going astray from God. This is not to say that I condemn feelings or emotion. No, God gave them to us for a reason.

Just because I tend to analyze things in a clinical stoic manner does not mean I am emotionless. I merely control my emotions in review of things better than others do. I approach problems analytically and calm. Emotions are good but not when then they’re so heightened that they cloud judgment and cause strife and error. You can trust me on this statement: I was extremely emotive when I was younger. It was my default position when approaching the world. It caused me nothing but grief. At the same time we need to realize that just because one does not emote doesn’t mean they are somehow more reliable. I see this mistake also. People that are mostly analytical and scientific are somehow more intelligent and their views are somehow more valid. That isn’t true either, which was strongly illustrated by an unwarranted panic and overreaction by ‘officials’ and ‘experts’ over the last year over what was essentially a really strong respiratory virus is a perfect case in point.

So where is the middle ground? Unbridled emotion in society with little thought is leading to chaos and confusion in America. Pure unadulterated emotion without reason and logic isn’t the answer. But neither is approaching things from a clinical dehumanized angle and dealing with people in a purely scientific analytical manner either…or is it. I posit that a reasoned logical approach is the best approach to problem solving. I believe we need to review how and why we quantify the scientific analytical approach the way we do. I posit that the analytical scientific approach is, in itself, a form of emotional approach. I also believe we could refer to this approach as an impassioned scientific approach that seeks to passionately solve the problem. All the while doing so under complete control and calm. I believe this is my general approach (except when you piss me off). I believe this level approach allows me to reach more people I otherwise wouldn’t be able to reach had I been hysterical, overly emotional and undisciplined.

Follow me here people…I believe this is going to produce a big payoff for those that understand what I am about to say.

On the subject of the feelings they need to be viewed in varying levels of degree. We need to realize that many names for different feelings are in reality feelings that belong to the same general category but vary by degree. Such as happy, content, content, glee, serenity, ecstatic, etc. They are all forms of happiness only marked by degree of intensity or ‘passion’. In other words, most know I will generally present things in a clinical analytical way to win an audience's or person's trust but I pursue that endeavor with zeal in terms of researching the facts and delivering them in a coherent package that is easily digestible by the reader or hearer. I am zealous for the truth but will systematically and in a delineated manner deliver the facts or data through level-headed reason and logic (syllogism). In a way I am logically scientific in my approach to theology and things of faith if only to show a scientific and sterile society the validity of my reasoning for existence of God and why we should adhere to a Judeo-Christian worldview. Specifically, why Jesus Christ is exactly who the Bible said He was…Son of God sent for forgiveness of our sins.

Additionally, we should realize that the words ‘zealous’ and “passion” are often used in normal everyday speech, and even defined in scientific books, as properly meaning feelings in their highest paradigm. I see no discontinuity here between scientific and Christian etymology. They are not mutually exclusive. They’re synonymous just as science and Christianity can merge into a single worldview for the same reasons I just mentioned. Impassioned reasoning and logic allow for both the physical realm of our sterile godless scientifically based society and religious worldview. Evenhanded logic and reasoning will lead you to accurate conclusions about both…primarily that the physical and metaphysical, the scientific and spiritual both exist and can be logically explained.

Unfortunately to date, the use of the term ‘passion’ has been wrong or misused. It assumes the extreme of something. As I just showed before, I can be level-headed and rational yet also be impassioned. Passion drives my stoic pursuit of the knowledge of Scripture, God and a passion to discover how to apply it in the world in people’s lives. My sincerest form of worship of God is study. For others singing and still others, pray and mediation. I study and exegete the Scripture to produce a practical application based on the truth or principle I have gleaned from the abundant spiritual Godly harvest fields of the Bible. I then rationally and calmly explain it to others that don’t believe, might believe or do believe. That is my ‘passion’. A passion of composed, equitable, unbiased delivery of truth. That truth will do its own work in other people’s souls and minds and produce further impassioned ‘A-ha’ moments or personal epiphanies through the work of the Holy Spirit.

When we realize that there are marked increases and decreases of degree or intensity we begin to realize something. Lower or more subdued feelings although controlled and restrained…are still feelings. They are just calmer and less emphatic. Lower volume does not imply less importance any more than higher volume denotes more importance. In truth ideas or truths without passion and or emotion equals no motion….no impetus of movement. There is only idea unmoved. Unfortunately these calmer degrees, although true feelings, are often mistaken and spoken of as if they were only functions of rational judgment. I disagree. I see them as merely delivered in a controlled manner by rational reasoned approaches such and as such are more dignified, honorably and accessible.

My approach is therefore not robotic, automaton or dehumanized but rather methodical and controlled. Why?...because this type of approach minimizes the chaos caused by heightened passions that ensue from overt emotionality and borderline ecstatic behaviors. I have a much better chance of getting my point across accurately and clearly as opposed to someone ‘feeling’ what I am saying. So, I say it again, “I’ll care about how you feel after I know what you think is correct.” Passion pursued in error creates much greater emotional error. Passion pursued in accuracy and truth produces something more than the sum of its parts. When that accuracy and truth is biblical it produces what God wants. It produces something righteous….something holy. We need to master or feelings not let our feelings master us.

In this way my calmness is still emotion not stoic judgment. Unfortunately, we have been sociologically programmed to believe that one who does not emote…does not care because they are not overtly manifesting emotion. This just isn’t true. I’m often just trying to prevent people from going off halfcocked unbiblically and in a ardent foolish manner. There is nothing worse than an emotionally sincere person that is sincerely wrong. It’s like a drag car out of control. Plenty of power but are in danger of veering out of control. From that origin has come many errors, wars, heresies and deaths.

I believe we must learn to separate the concept of the essence of emotion/feelings and the traits of urgency, intensity, agitation. When we see urgency and intensity we generally only characterize these as higher degrees of emotion. This is wrong. As I’ve shown, emotion may be emotion and yet not be ‘emotional’ or intense but rather calm and even. It’s an individual choice of delivery method and choice how to behave…or misbehave.  As I’ve heard it said before, feelings are the temperature of thought. Feelings are the energy expended to produce the action. Not everything needs to have the throttle pegged to the floor or the tachometer redlining to win a race. Sometimes consistency of effort wins the race. A beam of light may vary in intensity from the barely visible, to blinding or from an imperceptible trickle of warmth on a wintry day to the fierce scorching heat of the midsummer sun. Yet there is still heat in the ice of winter which is a hint of the summer to come. 

Said simply. When given over to ruled and measured emotion or passion, fruitfulness and prosperity abound and that is why God gave them to us and it is in knowledge and obedience to Him that they are controlled. In God there is peace. When given over to unruly passions and reckless emotion... fruitlessness, failure and hardship are harvested. In these we will see the conspicuous absence of God in people's lives. That is exactly what we are seeing in the world today. God warned us that this would happened to a people under judgment. 

Romans 1:24-26 Therefore God gave them up in the lusts of their hearts to impurity, to the dishonoring of their bodies among themselves, because they exchanged the truth about God for a lie and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever! Amen. For this reason God gave them up to dishonorable passions.

1 Thessalonians 4:3-5 For this is the will of God, your sanctification: that you abstain from sexual immorality; that each one of you know how to control his own body in holiness and honor, not in the passion of lust like the Gentiles who do not know God….