They will have the audacity to do this while categorizing you as mentally deficient as a religious person and making religions like Christianity into a clinical neurological/psychological disorder. All the while they give a green light to horrid sins like abortion and deviant sexual behavior. Remember folks, many "educated" people will tell you that a child in-utero isn't even human. If they can get your tax money to fund abortions, it will just be a matter of time before they will use your own tax money to find you incompetent or mentally deficient for what you believe.
I guess I should start this article by asking the reader if
they have ever heard of Neurotheology?
My guess is that outside of a few Christians in the medical field, not many will have heard of it. The
only reason I showed even a passing interest in it is because the prefix neuro-
was followed by the word theology. So, I sharpened my pencil and did some
homework to educate myself. I guess the next questions that should be asked are: Why
should I care what Neurotheology is? –and- How does Neurotheology affect me?
Read on folks and be surprised, slightly filled with dread and unease as we slide down the rabbit hole.
Neurotheology was a term coined/used by Dr. Andrew Newberg, Adjunct
Professor of Religious Studies and an Associate Professor of Radiology at the
University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine. It is a term used by Dr. Andrew
Newberg to describe the relationship between the brain and religious
experience. The scientific community is claiming that certain areas of our
brain are responsible for having posited the idea that a god could exist. I imagine
then that if this portion of the brain could be killed off, the concept of a god
could be too. Interesting in a novel kind of way but nothing really nutty going
on here. Just a man that might have a religious background and possible belief
in God trying to bridge the gap between his belief and his work. No biggie I
guess.
Doing a little bit more internet searching I go to the
bastion of academic credibility Wikipedia (*gag*) Wiki defines Neurotheology
(also known as spiritual neuroscience) as an attempt to explain religious
experience and behavior in neuro-scientific terms. It is the study of
correlations of physical neural phenomena with subjective experiences of spirituality
and hypotheses to explain these phenomena. In other words spiritual experiences
unique to each individual person. Furthermore, it says that these experiences
are the sum product of neurological and evolutionary actions. In layman's terms, your belief in God is nothing more than atoms zipping around, electrons jumping orbits and chemical reactions (yawn). This means that
not only are they subjective to each individual, our religious experiences are
the product of our imaginations, which being the product of our brains…are the
sum product of evolutionary science.
In short, it is predominantly godless scientists
attempting to explain away God as an evolutionary figment of human
imagination…nothing more. The science geeks even have a name for the God
specific portion of the brain. Scientists refer to the portion of the mind that
conjures up God from nothing as the (drum roll please....) “God Center”. How breathtakingly original
of them. Geneticists have a genetic variation on this theme that attempt to
convince us that this “God Center” goes down to the genetic level and have
affectionately named the associated gene the (second drum roll and high hat please...) “God Gene”. Not much room for
originality after all that boring scientific method, is there?
Frankly, I don’t view anything wrong with this avenue of
inquiry. Obviously there are portions of the brain engaged when dealing with
God. God made us to think and have a relationship with Him. It should not
surprise anyone that studies of a person's brain that is praying would show that it is the
same brain center that is engaged when a person speaks or talks with another
person. The only people this seemed to surprise were godless researchers. The
truth is…if scientists wish to foolishly search for the reason mankind has
fabricated the existence of God…have at it. Their entire presupposition is
flawed so their end results can only be
flawed too. That’s fine, people are allowed to study and question things. Whatever. I honestly believe questions and doubts from skeptics inevitably
strengthen the Christian faith in the end because God is indeed real and will
not be mocked. Under the microscope of academic inquiry, Scriptures and God
generally have fared quite well as opposed to other worldviews contrary to what a militant or rabid atheist will tout.
My problem is not in the honest inquiry but rather in the
misuse and misinterpretation of the retrieved data. The same evidence that can
often be used to show God’s existence such as a genetic fingerprint in man that
points to intentional or intellectual design can also be used to show a direct
correlation to demonic evolutionary theory to show just the opposite. Often
these atheistic “proofs” can be used to assume more than the prima facie evidence warrants. Enter militant atheism. Specifically militant atheist Daniel Dennett
in his book Breaking the Spell: Religion as a Natural Phenomenon. It is a book
in which he discusses the “probability” that a gene called VMAT2 may fully
account for religious belief...therefore the existence of God (or lack thereof). What’s more is Dean
Hamer a neurobiologist, speculated in his book The God Gene that he had found this exact
type of gene that would be responsible for such a role.
Ironically, the VMAT2 gene is polymorphic in human beings,
meaning that there are different mutations of it in different people. The VMAT2
gene variants are ideally positioned therefore (in atheistic scientist’s eyes)
to account for differences in people's cognitive responses to the same religious
stimuli. Obviously, this would account for why some are so "weak-minded” and easily duped by "superstitious nonsense” and why some "more evolved" intelligent types like
our beloved scientists are too smart (or too evolved) for all of these god fairy tales.
You should already see where this is going folks...and it should bother you.
It therefore can then be deduced that those with this gene variant could conceivably be deemed “deficient” if they have this variant. Considering we live in a godless society run by an institutionalized godless government and society is manipulated/coerced by many godless education centers…well…figure it out people. Does eugenics ring any bells with people? Think Adolf Hitler and Margaret Sanger. In the next post I will explain why the entire “science” involved in this argument becomes irrelevant because of horribly flawed logic and reasoning.
Proverbs 21:30 ~ There is no wisdom, no insight, no plan that can succeed against the Lord.
1 Corinthians 3:19 ~ "For the wisdom of this world is folly with God. For it is written, “He catches the wise in their craftiness,”
God will not be mocked and I will show why in the next post.
It therefore can then be deduced that those with this gene variant could conceivably be deemed “deficient” if they have this variant. Considering we live in a godless society run by an institutionalized godless government and society is manipulated/coerced by many godless education centers…well…figure it out people. Does eugenics ring any bells with people? Think Adolf Hitler and Margaret Sanger. In the next post I will explain why the entire “science” involved in this argument becomes irrelevant because of horribly flawed logic and reasoning.
Proverbs 21:30 ~ There is no wisdom, no insight, no plan that can succeed against the Lord.
1 Corinthians 3:19 ~ "For the wisdom of this world is folly with God. For it is written, “He catches the wise in their craftiness,”
God will not be mocked and I will show why in the next post.
[Concluded in Part II]
1 comment:
En savoir plus sur l'auteur www.dolabuy.su Cliquez ici répliques de designer de haute qualité allez sur le site Web sacs de répliques AAA
Post a Comment