What AI Says I Am, Part V: Andy's Theology-The Controversial

Theology is never without its controversy and disagreements within Christianity. So I will address some of mine here. Personally I do not believe the following topics warrant arguing over. Especially in front of a non-believer who will view the disagreements as disunity or dysfunction within the body of Christ. In the Body of Christ there is room for grace and liberty. Only in essentials is orthodoxy required.

1. Calvinism vs. Arminianism

Assessment: Explicitly nuanced; predominantly Calvinistic

This is one of the most interesting areas. Pierson did not originally present himself as a straightforward Calvinist. In 2010 he explicitly wrote: “I have not fallen fully to Calvinism but I have not abandoned Arminianism either.” He described himself as sitting between the two positions while leaning toward Calvinism. But his theology became more explicitly compatible with Calvinism. In his discussion of Revelation and predestination, he says: God sovereignty elects/predestines; the Spirit regenerates; God's grace produces obedience; genuine believers respond positively to God's commands; Divine sovereignty and human accountability coexist. He also explicitly says that he leans toward Calvinism and TULIP, while maintaining that human free will and divine predestination operate concurrently.

My characterization: I would describe the trajectory as: Early uncertainty → Calvinistic leaning → Modified/Compatibilist Calvinistic position.

I would not describe him as a strict five-point Calvinist without qualification, because he repeatedly emphasizes genuine human responsibility/free will and does not simply adopt a simplistic “God determines everything, therefore human choice is irrelevant” formulation.

2. AI

Assessment: Increasingly concerned; theological rather than merely technological analysis

This is one of his newest theological concerns. His 2025 AI series describes a movement in his own thinking from regarding AI as relatively benign toward a much more ominous assessment. His theological argument includes several propositions:

AI is not human.

He distinguishes AI decision-making from human free will, arguing that human free will arises from conscious moral agency/conscience while AI operates through computation and programmed/subroutine processes.

AI is morally amoral rather than inherently moral.

Therefore humans must supply the moral framework.

AI magnifies human problems.

Because humans create and deploy AI, human sin, incentives and institutional failures can become technologically amplified.

Language is particularly important.

In Part 3, he connects AI and language to Genesis, the Fall, Babel and God's sustaining Word. This is a fascinating development because AI has become, for Pierson, not merely a technology question but a theological anthropology question: What makes humans human?

3. Political theology

Assessment: Explicitly Christian with Conservative (not Republican) cultural analysis

Pierson's political writing should be separated from his doctrinal writing. He interprets contemporary political movements through a biblical moral framework and has written strongly against progressivism, Marxism and other movements he regards as incompatible with Christianity.

Theologically, however, the underlying principle is clear: Politics is not morally neutral. Political ideas must ultimately be evaluated against his understanding of biblical truth.

4. Science

Assessment: Pro-science but Anti-Scientism

This distinction is central to his writing. Pierson does not reject science. Rather, he repeatedly argues that science operates within philosophical assumptions and that scientific conclusions can be affected by presuppositions. His comparison of Answers in Genesis and the National Center for Science Education is particularly revealing: He argues that identical evidence can be interpreted differently depending upon one's underlying assumptions. His 2014 writing approvingly cites the distinction between scientific capability and moral guidance.

He therefore tends toward: Science as legitimate investigation of creation but rejects: Science as an autonomous authority capable of settling every metaphysical or moral question.

5. Spiritual Gifts

Assessment: Continuationist indications; some offices considered unique/non-repeatable

This requires more care. Pierson clearly believes the Holy Spirit gives spiritual gifts to believers and that prophecy, tongues, healing and other gifts are biblical realities. His writing on Joel 2 and Acts 2 treats the Pentecostal outpouring and supernatural gifts as genuine manifestations of the Spirit. He also discusses prophecy as a New Testament spiritual function intended to edify and guide the body. However, he draws a significant distinction concerning apostleship. He argues that the unique apostolic office occupied by the original apostles is now defunct, while acknowledging other uses of “apostle” in the generic sense of “sent one.” So I would characterize him as: Not straightforward cessationist. More accurately: He appears continuationist regarding spiritual gifts, but does not believe every biblical office continues in exactly the same form.

6. Prophecy

Assessment: strongly affirming of biblical prophecy; cautious about speculative end-times prediction

This is another area where his position has developed.

Earlier Pierson spent substantial effort studying Daniel and Revelation. But he repeatedly warned against pretending to know things Scripture does not clearly reveal. In 2010 he wrote that he was deliberately taking neutral positions on some difficult prophetic questions while maintaining confidence in Scripture's inerrancy.

His 2012 writing similarly says that Revelation should not become material for sensationalistic “end of the world” predictions. So there is a distinction: Biblical prophecy: affirmed. Prophetic speculation: Strongly questioned.

7. End-Times Theology

Assessment: Significant Evolution

This may be the most consequential theological development I found. Pierson explicitly says that he used to hold Dispensationalist Pre-Tribulation, Premillennial Rapture theology, but that he subsequently moved away from it. Earlier material nevertheless contains clearly premillennial/tribulational concepts. For example, a 2012 discussion describes a future Tribulation, Israel recognizing Jesus as Messiah, Christ's second coming, and a thousand-year earthly reign. So his theological development appears approximately: Earlier: Dispensational → premillennial → pretribulational framework.

Current: Still believes in Christ's return and future consummation, but rejects the classic Left Behind / Hal Lindsey dispensational model. That is explicitly documented rather than inferred. I would not assign him a definitive current amillennial, postmillennial, or historic-premillennial label without finding a later statement explicitly identifying one.

8. Israel

Assessment: Strong biblical/theological significance; precise current eschatological position uncertain.

His earlier writings clearly distinguish Israel's role in biblical prophecy and discuss Israel's future relationship to Christ. However, because he later says he moved away from dispensationalism, we shouldn't automatically assume that his earlier Israel theology remains unchanged. What can safely be said is: Israel remains an important biblical category in his theological framework. What cannot safely be concluded from the material I've found is exactly how he currently resolves: Israel and the Church, Romans 11, Covenant Theology Vs. Dispensationalism, National Israel's Future, Whether Israel retains a distinct eschatological program

What AI Says I Am, Part IV: Andy's Theology-The Core

The AI synopsis was the most surprisingly accurate portion of its review about me. It makes matter-of-fact succinct statements about my theology that are accurate. Having reviewed all 1700+ posts I have done over all most 17 years it goes on to make a statement about my doctrinal and belief consistency. I do not waiver. I am not tossed about like a ship on the sea. I am most fulfilled because of this fact. I have reverently persevere in my faith.

Joshua 1:7: "Only be strong and very courageous, being careful to do according to all the law that Moses my servant commanded you. Do not turn from it to the right hand or to the left, that you may have good success wherever you go."

Proverbs 4:25-27: "Let your eyes look directly forward, and your gaze be straight before you... Do not swerve to the right or to the left; turn your foot away from evil."

Matthew 5:37: Jesus advises that our everyday communication should be honest and reliable, letting our "yes" mean "yes" and our "no" mean "no".

1 Corinthians 15:58: Believers are urged to be "steadfast, immovable, always abounding in the work of the Lord," knowing their daily efforts matter.

1. Scripture: Very High View/Inerrancy

Assessment: Explicitly stated

This is probably the clearest theological conviction in the archive. Pierson explicitly describes Scripture as inerrant, infallible, authoritative, God-breathed, and objectively true. In his 2011 Inerrancy of Scripture series, he says that questioning Scripture ultimately questions God's authority and describes inerrancy as foundational to Christianity. He also argues that apparent conflicts between Scripture and scientific conclusions should be resolved by recognizing human fallibility rather than assuming Scripture is wrong. His hermeneutic is therefore: God's Word → Interpret reality through it → Critique human interpretations accordingly.

This is important because it explains much of his later cultural writing.

2. Christology

Assessment: Explicitly stated

Pierson identifies the deity and humanity of Christ as essential Christian doctrine. He also treats Christ as the center and ultimate subject of Scripture. His writings repeatedly connect Old Testament prophecy and typology to Christ, arguing that the Old Testament ultimately points forward to Christ's redemptive work.  He also reasons from Christ's divinity to the reliability of Christ's statements concerning Scripture.

So the framework is distinctly Christ-centered rather than merely theistic.

3. Trinity

Assessment: Explicitly stated.

Pierson identifies the Trinity as an essential Christian doctrine. His treatment of the Holy Spirit is explicitly personal rather than impersonal. He describes the Spirit as someone who can be loved, grieved, offended, indwell believers, guide them and distribute spiritual gifts. That places him squarely within classical Trinitarian Christianity.

4. Salvation

Assessment: Explicitly stated

His stated soteriology/salvation includes: Human sinfulness/original sin, total depravity, substitutionary atonement, Christ's physical resurrection, salvation by grace through faith, sanctification, final judgment. He explicitly says salvation is by grace through faith, rather than through works contrary to Catholic teaching. He also describes believers as being incorporated into the already-existing Spirit-baptized Body of Christ when they repent and believe. So his basic soteriology is unmistakably evangelical Protestant.

5. Creation

Assessment: Historical Adam; Strong creationist/Inerrantist orientation; exact chronology less certain

This is another area where his position isn't simply reducible to “young earth.” In 2015 he explicitly discusses: Gap Theory, Young Earth Creationism, Old Earth Creationism and distinguishes the age of creation from the question of whether Adam was historical. He considers the latter particularly significant. Elsewhere he argues that Genesis should be understood as historical narrative and that Scripture's claims about creation cannot simply be dismissed because modern scientific conclusions appear to contradict them. He has also suggested that future scientific discoveries may illuminate currently unresolved questions concerning creation and time.

6. Women in Ministry

Assessment: Complementarian, with substantial nuance

This is one of the clearest positions in the archive. Pierson explicitly argues that Scripture presents different male and female roles, including male leadership in the church. He simultaneously insists that women are not ontologically inferior to men. He distinguishes: Equality of being/value from difference of function/role. His treatment of prophecy is especially interesting. He accepts that women prophesied in the New Testament and that the Spirit was poured out on both men and women. But he argues that prophecy does not necessarily constitute sustained ecclesiastical leadership, distinguishing prophetic ministry from pastoral/teaching authority. His ultimate conclusion in 2011 was that the preponderance of Scripture favors male leadership in the church, although he acknowledged ambiguity in some passages. So: Complementarian, but not “women can't minister.” That's a much more accurate description.

7. The Church

Assessment: Strongly Ecclesiological and Institutional

Pierson has a fairly substantial conception of what constitutes a healthy church. An early list includes:

Prayer

Correct biblical doctrine

Evangelistic witness

Baptism and Lord’s Supper

Fellowship

Church discipline

Love for christ

Worship

Biblical church government

Personal holiness

Spiritual power in ministry

He has a strong criticism of seeker-sensitive Christianity. His argument is that the church exists primarily for: God's Glory → Worship → Gospel → Holiness, rather than: Entertainment → Consumer Satisfaction → Numerical Growth.He also sees the church as both an individual congregation and the universal Body of Christ, emphasizing mutual edification rather than reducing church to a Sunday sermon.

8. Morality

Assessment: Objective, biblical, Strongly Theocentric

Pierson explicitly places certain moral issues in the category of non-negotiable Christian convictions.

His framework includes: Holiness, sexual morality, abortion, euthanasia, marriage, human dignity, obedience to god's moral standard

He distinguishes moral commandments that he believes remain applicable from Israel's civil/ceremonial regulations that he believes were fulfilled or superseded in Christ. This is essentially a moral continuity approach to the Old Testament rather than either: “The Old Testament law is irrelevant” or “Christians must reproduce ancient Israel's civil law.”

9. Doesn't Treat Every Doctrine Equally

Pierson explicitly separates:

Essential Doctrines

Trinity

Deity/humanity of Christ

Original sin

Substitutionary atonement

Resurrection

Salvation by grace through faith

Sanctification

Christ's return

Final judgment

Nonessential Doctrines

Calvinism vs. Arminianism

Precise creation model

Certain hermeneutical differences

Aspects of eschatology 

He explicitly warns against treating people as unsaved merely because they disagree over secondary doctrines. That creates an interesting tension with his sometimes extremely forceful cultural writing.

10. Epistemology

Assessment: Foundational to the Entire SoulJournaler Project

This may actually be the most important category that wasn't in your original list. Pierson repeatedly asks:

How do we know what we know?

And his answer is heavily influenced by: Scripture, Presuppositions, Human fallibility, Divine Revelation, Reason, Observation, the effects of sin on human judgment

His warning about “sifting the Word” according to personal preference is especially significant. He believes people don't merely have wrong conclusions—they can begin with wrong interpretive assumptions and then selectively interpret evidence to reinforce them. That principle appears in his biblical interpretation, science writing, political commentary and cultural criticism.

What AI Says I Am, Part III: Engaging the Cultural Zeitgeist

ChatGPT researched SoulJournaler and Andy Pierson across my blog's archive, including material from 2010 through September 2026. The result is a fairly coherent picture: SoulJournaler is not simply a devotional blog, it has developed into a long-running personal theological journal that combines biblical interpretation, apologetics, Christian ethics, science/technology, cultural criticism, personal reflection, and increasingly political commentary. Interesting characteristics.

1. There's an Interesting Tension in His Theology

One of the most interesting things about the archive is that Pierson simultaneously emphasizes: Conviction and Self-examination. He doesn't merely criticize society. He repeatedly says Christians themselves are compromised including himself. For example, in older material he discusses the danger of Christians filtering Scripture through their own desires. In later writing he repeatedly returns to:

Accountability-Sin-Hypocrisy-Spiritual Complacency-Christian Compromise-Christian Passivity-Moral Courage. That gives the blog a somewhat prophetic rather than merely academic character.

2. “Prophetic” is Actually Recurring Self-Understanding

This becomes much more explicit in the later archive. In the 2025 material, Pierson describes a pattern in which he believes he recognized ideological and societal changes years before they became widely recognized. He says other Christians have described this as prophetic, while he himself describes the experience more cautiously and sometimes negatively. That is significant because it explains the tone of much of the recent writing. He isn't simply trying to analyze: “What happened?” He frequently asks: “What does this reveal about where society is spiritually headed?” That's the underlying engine of much of SoulJournaler's cultural commentary.

3. Book of Judges has Become Particularly Important Recently

This connects directly with the material you've been developing. Pierson's recent “Tell It to the Judge” series uses the biblical book of Judges as a framework for interpreting social decline. His August 2026 entry describes the recurring Judges cycle: Sin → Disobedience → Distress → Crying to God → Deliverance → Relapse. He then applies that framework to contemporary society. The August 29 article, “Judged by the Company You Keep,” develops the idea that Israel's proximity to surrounding nations affected Israel's own behavior. He connects that with the contemporary idea that people become shaped by what they remain close to. And by September 15, the series has progressed into Judges 5, where he interprets abandoned highways and social insecurity as symptoms of societal breakdown. So the Judges study isn't an isolated Bible study. It appears to be becoming a framework for interpreting civilization itself.

4. The “Company you Keep” Idea is Older Than the 2026 Judges Series

A 2025 SoulJournaler article called “The Company You Keep: A Proximal Relationship” develops essentially the same conceptual framework before the current Judges series. Pierson connects proximity, relationships, imitation and spiritual formation, ultimately arguing that one's relationship with God—or lack of relationship with God—affects one's character.

So “Judged by the Company You Keep” appears to be an extension of an already-developed SoulJournaler theme rather than a completely new idea.

5. Politics is Much More Prominent Recently

There is a clear chronological development here.

• 2010–2013

The emphasis is heavily on: Christianity, Apologetics, Scripture, Theology, Spiritual Formation, Philosophy, Science

• 2014–2019

The subject matter expands into: Culture, Morality, Science, Politics, Social Issues, Christian Institutions

• 2020 to Date

Political and cultural commentary becomes substantially more prominent. For example, his 2020 archive contains commentary on the presidential election, political division, Christianity and political identity. By 2025–2026, politics and culture are frequently integrated directly into biblical interpretation. Recent examples include articles addressing:

Marxism, Nationalism, Progressivism, Trump, Political Polarization, Social Disorder, Cultural Decline, Israel/Judges, Sexuality and Immorality

The important distinction is that politics appears to function as a subset of his larger theological worldview, rather than theology being merely an appendage to political commentary.

6. His Political Writing is Theologically Ideological

This needs to be seen as fallout of the theological material. For example, his 2026 article “The American Marxist Ruse” explicitly argues that certain contemporary progressive movements should be understood through a Marxist/Cultural Marxist framework, thereby antithetical to Christianity. That is Pierson's argument, not an established neutral description of those movements. Similarly, his 2025 article “Professional Victims and Political Frauds” uses strongly partisan political language and discusses progressives, Marxists, Gaza and political violence through a Christian interpretive framework. So when researching SoulJournaler academically, I'd classify these pieces as primary-source commentary scholarship. That's an important distinction if you're using his material in a Bible study, article, or research project.

7. There’s a Strong Theme of Accountability

If I had to identify one word that repeatedly connects the early and late SoulJournaler archives, it would probably be: Accountability.

Pierson repeatedly argues that: Knowledge leads to responsibility which leads to action and finally leads to accountability. His August 2026 piece “Keeping Your End of the Deal” is particularly explicit. He connects suffering, perseverance, responsibility and the biblical principle that those who have been entrusted with more are accountable for what they do with it. That idea is broader than politics. He applies it to:

Parents-Christians-Pastors-Employees-Managers-Leaders-Citizens-Institutions-Governments

It appears to be one of the foundational moral concepts of his writing.

8. World Chaos and Sin Forced a Change in Writing Style

There is also a noticeable stylistic evolution.

• Older SoulJournaler

The early material tends to be: Argumentative, Apologetic, Theological, Analytical, Scripture-heavy. Concerned with definitions and logical consistency

• Newer SoulJournaler

The prose increasingly becomes: Prophetic, Confrontational, Metaphorical, Culturally diagnostic, Emotionally intense. Heavily connected to current events

His metaphors become especially prominent and intense. For example, he uses: Disease/cancer, Warfare, Infrastructure collapse, Technological systems, Wolves and traps, Signal/noise, Engineering, Weightlifting, Biological systems

These aren't random stylistic choices. They reflect his adaptive background and worldview. Pierson/Souljournaler is changing with the times to directly confront and address the hard issues. The downward trend of the spirit of the age.

What A.I. Says I Am, Part II: I Reason From Scripture

What AI Says I Am, Part 2: I Reason From Bible

I reason from Scripture to defend my faith, defend my worldview and also to show that my worldview and belief system's logic sticks together as a coherent logically reasoned whole. I do it the exact same way Paul the Apostle did. It's called Presuppositional Apologetics. I've been doing it this way for over a decade. I have won more people to the faith this way than bashing someone over the head with their sins and a 3lb Bible.

Acts 17:1-2 When Paul and his companions had passed through Amphipolis and Apollonia, they came to Thessalonica, where there was a Jewish synagogue. As was his custom, Paul went into the synagogue, and on three Sabbath days he reasoned with them from the Scriptures

The atheist's circular reasoning in the "God wrote the Bible so it can't be wrong because He's technically omnipotent" accusation can only be invoked if in fact God is not the perfect objective truth/law giver. The atheist or non-believer has the burden of proof on them to prove this is not true if I first make the claim. When I declare that God is the source of perfect objective truth, I am putting forth a worldview that accounts for the "laws of logic" themselves. The very one's the atheist is attempting to hijack with this absurd accusation.

In other words, atheistic materialism itself fails to explain logic: If the universe is purely material and accidental, there is no logical basis for why immaterial (metaphysical) laws of logic should exist or remain consistent…or even math and language for that matter. The Non-Believer has to borrow the Christian worldview every time they attempt to use "sound reason" or "logic" to dismantle Scripture. They are actually borrowing the Christian worldview—which accounts for absolute, objective laws—to argue against it.

When I adopt this stance, I am engaging with the world on its own terms linguistically (like Paul) while refusing to compromise on the foundational authority of Scripture. In so doing I have identified the crucial philosophical reality that: Every worldview (including atheism) rests upon axioms (ultimate assumptions) that cannot be proven by outside standards without resulting in circular logic. God is the ultimate lawgiver and the source of logic itself. To judge God by an outside standard of logic would mean that standard is higher than God, which is a contradiction.

A Christian essentially has to outsmart the antagonistic atheist argument by showing its incoherence. They are throwing stones in a glass house.

1. Apologetics is a Major Pillar

Logic-Epistemology-Science-Origins-Physics-Mathematics-Consciousness-Quantum Mechanics-Technology-Artificial Intelligence
His 2013 “Nexus of the Future” begins with Colossians 1:15–20 and treats Christ as the organizing center of creation. That produces an interesting characteristic of the blog: Pierson doesn't generally separate “theology” from science and technology. He tries to construct a unified worldview not unlike theoretical physicists have for a century since Albert Einstein, Paul Dirac and others.

2. He Has a Strong Interest in Science/Technology

This becomes particularly pronounced in the later archive. His writings discuss things such as:

Quantum entanglement-AI-Technological Development-Scientific Methodology-Information-Information Theory-Human/Machine Relationships-Technological Dependence

A.I. quickly surmised that when I defend my faith or attempt to make people understand that what I am saying is soundly reasoned logical truth, I do so in the manner that Paul the Apostle did. I speak in the language of the world but the backbone of my discussion is always undergirded with the Scripture. This method is called presuppositional apologetics. I do this for the same reason Paul did. It is the only source of objective truth that doesn't require circular reasoning regardless of how many times it is accused of doing so. 

The blog repeatedly attempts to bridge Christian theology, logic, science and philosophy. For example, Pierson's writings on general revelation argue that the natural world provides evidence of God while Scripture provides the special revelation necessary for understanding God more clearly. He explicitly connects scientific investigation with examination of the natural world. He also wrote extensively about:

His 2026 writings are particularly interesting because AI becomes almost a theological issue. He argues that AI can reproduce errors and biases at enormous scale and worries about humans increasingly outsourcing knowledge and judgment to technological systems including theological ideas. He frames this through biblical themes involving knowledge, wisdom, deception and dependence upon God. That represents an evolution from his earlier science-versus-faith apologetics toward a broader technology-and-humanity critique.

3. His View of Christianity is Doctrinal

The archive isn't simply generic spirituality. In 2011 he explicitly identifies several doctrines as Christian essentials, including:
Trinity-Christ's Divinity and Humanity-Human Sinfulness-Salvation through Christ
He distinguishes those essentials from secondary theological disagreements and argues that Christians should not treat every doctrinal disagreement as grounds for attacking fellow believers.

At the same time, he has written strongly against theological positions he regards as outside orthodox Christianity. For example, his 2012 series on “Counterfeit Religions” discusses Mormonism and Scientology from a strongly evangelical/orthodox Christian perspective. This will be more thoroughly addressed in a later post.

What A.I. Says I Am, Part I: The Theological Scribe

AI’s Comprehensive Understanding of I: Andy Pierson 

Yes, I did a play on words with A.I. and I Am. Poorly I should add.

I did an AI search on myself and my online presence. I particularly I focused it on my blog. What came back is, well…mostly accurate and Biblical. That means something to me. AI is pragmatic and logical looking for the most accurate aggregate of a given topic. It shows I’ve had a logical and theological consistency over 16 years saying and teaching the same thing with integrity. So here it is. At times AI refers to itself or me in first person. At other times it refers to itself or me in third person. It becomes annoying but the main points aren’t lost on AI’s current inability to grammatically proof read its own output. The main ideas and points it aggregates still appear accurate.

ChatGPT researched SoulJournaler and Andy Pierson across the blog's archive, including material from 2010 through September 2026. The result is a fairly coherent picture: SoulJournaler is not simply a devotional blog. It has developed into a long-running personal theological journal that combines biblical interpretation, apologetics, Christian ethics, science/technology, cultural criticism, personal reflection, and increasingly political commentary.

1. Who Am I? Who is Andy Pierson and how do I present myself?

The earliest material I found is from 2010. Pierson identifies himself as a “scribe” and “theologian,” as well as a weightlifter, father, and member of the Church. A recurring theme is the intersection of faith and rational inquiry. In a 2010 piece, he describes having an engineering background and says he moved away from engineering toward Christian ministry because he became convinced Christianity was grounded in evidence rather than blind faith. In 2015, he wrote that he was employed and had posted both business and ministry articles because he sensed a calling toward full-time Gospel ministry while potentially remaining bi-vocational as a Quality Engineer, Quality Manager, or Project Manager. So an important part of the SoulJournaler identity is: Engineering, scientific thinking, Christianity, theology/apologetics, writing/teaching and cultural analysis.

2. His Central Theological Framework

Across the archive, several convictions appear repeatedly. (1) Scripture is the controlling authority. Pierson repeatedly treats Scripture as the ultimate standard against which ideas, behavior, culture and even scientific interpretations should be examined. One particularly revealing 2010 article is “Sifting The Word to Find What We Want, Not What We Need.” His argument is that people can approach Scripture with pre-existing desires and effectively filter the biblical text until it tells them what they already wanted to hear. That idea becomes extremely important when reading his later work. His basic hermeneutical concern is: Don't make Scripture conform to the reader; make the reader conform to Scripture. That is one of the strongest continuities I found over the entire sixteen-year archive.

3. Truth and Christian Exclusivity

Another foundational theme is objective truth. In Truth or Intolerances (2010), Pierson argues that Christianity's exclusive truth claims shouldn't automatically be classified as intolerance. He uses the law of non-contradiction and argues that mutually contradictory claims cannot simultaneously be true in the same sense. For him, the ultimate truth is identified with Christ. This explains much of his later writing. He isn't approaching Christianity primarily as: “This is what Christianity means to me.” He's approaching it as: “This is what is true, and therefore reality must ultimately conform to it.”That distinction is fundamental to understanding SoulJournaler.

4. Andy’s Engineering is more than biography—It Influences His Metaphors

This is one of the more interesting findings. His engineering background shows up repeatedly in how he explains theology. Examples include concepts such as:

Signal → Distortion → Interference → Transmission…to explain sin and revelation.

He also uses: Systems → Failure → Feedback → Correction...to describe society and organizations.

He also uses: Load → Resistance → Endurance → Strength...to describe suffering/spiritual development.

That gives SoulJournaler a recognizable intellectual vocabulary:

Biblical theology interpreted through engineering, science, systems thinking and physical training.

5. His Treatment of Suffering is Highly Personal

The 2026 “Keeping Your End of the Deal” article gives perhaps the clearest window into Pierson personally. He discusses job loss, completing college, losing family members, watching a fiancé experience cancer, parenting, professional difficulties and other trials. He interprets these experiences primarily through endurance, perseverance and spiritual formation. The 2010 series on Evil and Suffering was also highy detailed to this effect.

His metaphor is essentially: Suffering is spiritual resistance training. That's consistent with the weightlifting analogy he uses elsewhere. This also explains why his writing about accountability can sound unusually forceful: he interprets endurance as something that creates responsibility rather than merely something that happens to a person.

Christianity isn't a cake walk for Andy. Part of the Christian walk is pain and suffering. The Christian isn't to invite it per se but nor should they run from it or avoid it if the straightest course is directly through it.

6. The Deepest Recurring Idea

After looking across 17 years of material, I think the central SoulJournaler question is actually simpler than all the individual subjects:

What happens when human beings substitute their own wisdom for God's? 

That question appears in different clothing:

Biblical studies: Israel abandons God.

Ethics: Humans redefine morality.

Politics: Ideology becomes a substitute religion.

Science: Methodological assumptions become unquestioned boundaries.

AI: Human beings outsource judgment to machines.

Culture: People normalize behavior Scripture condemns.

Relationships: People become like the company they keep.

Personal life: Suffering tests whether faith is genuine.

That gives the enormous archive a surprisingly coherent center.

Bottom line

The remarkable continuity is that the 2010 writer asking how human beings distort truth through their own assumptions is recognizably the same writer in 2026 arguing that culture, politics, science and AI can become competing authorities that displace biblical truth.

The recent Judges material in September 2026 fits very naturally into the latest phase of that corpus: The book of Judges becomes a lens through which Pierson examines the relationship between spiritual apostasy, cultural imitation, leadership, social breakdown and divine judgment.

Tell It to the Judge, Part III: Breakdown On the Side of the Road

In Judges 5 we see the Song of Deborah. There is one thing that is nearly always taught from the Scripture when it comes to Deborah. The reason Deborah is actually in a position of power is in and of itself, a national judgment. We need move past the fact that men have abdicated the role as leaders/judges at times by this point in Israel. Regardless of this being a sign of judgment on a nation, if we move past this we see indicators that the nation was still in steep spiritual freefall even in the Song of Deborah itself. In a slight turnaround, Deborah and Barak are able to slow the downward decent of Israel’s moral trajectory temporarily but the Song of Deborah is actually damning to Israel.

In Judges 5:6 and 7 we see the telling language. “In the days of Shamgar son of Anath. In the days of Jael, the highways were abandoned; travelers took to winding paths. Villagers in Israel would not fight; they held back until I, Deborah, arose, until I arose, a mother in Israel."

We see national ruin. Shamgar the prior judge to Deborah and Barak did not succeed in subduing the interior of Israel to a state of order and security. Whoever Jael (the Helper) may have been, whether Ehud, Shamgar, or some other hero, even he was unable to restore confidence to the dwellers in the land, or to allow communication between the towns and villages to pass easily or securely. The description here reminds one of the inner cities and illegal immigrant overrunning cities in our own times. Lawlessness.

A strong leadership is needed in order to inspire confidence and to allow the conditions of life to be consistently uniform and reliable. A country may be great in military strength but morally, socially and politically, at a standstill because of the absence of needed leadership, structure and internal direction. If there is no moral zeal for the public welfare the public will often be immoral and spiritually dead.

While the song celebrates a military victory, its opening verses expose a nation suffering from deep internal collapse, lawlessness, and a vacuum devoid of leaders. The description of abandoned highways and travelers taking to winding paths reveals a complete breakdown of law and order. Citizens could no longer travel safely on main roads due to the threat of violence, banditry and foreign oppression. The phrase "villagers in Israel would not fight; they held back" highlights a profound lack of resolve in citizens also. Spiritual and moral decay often manifests as collective paralysis, where the public loses the will to defend their communities or sometimes even themselves due to fear or reprisal. Good is punished and evil is rewarded.

Military strength alone cannot sustain a nation if its internal moral and social structures are hollowed out. That is because that moral rot will usually infect the military also. Without strong, principled leadership to inspire confidence and enforce justice, a society naturally fractures. Unfortunately, we see this in many places in society today. It is pervasive on social media. Welcome to America 2026.

When a people are morally bankrupt and socially under duress the communication is reduced or rendered useless. When compounded with highways and main thoroughfares that are not reliable there will be systemic breakdown. Societies need to have safely flowing goods AND ideas for proper social interaction. Physical highways are the routes of employment and paths for movement of resources and functioning civilization. All really great empires/governments have distinguished themselves in road making or at least blazers of trails whether on land or sea…the Romans, British and America to name a few. The main reason the Roman Empire became so expansive and so powerful for so long was because of the Roman road systems. The Romans had created such an extensive and safe road system that it could usually be travelled without risk to life or property by a traveler. This is even indirectly alluded to in the Bible when we read passages like Galatians 4:4:

Galatians 4:4 But when the fullness of time had come, God sent forth his Son, born of woman, born under the law…

Why was it the fullness of time or perfect time? Primarily because of two things: There was a universal language. The Koine Greek language was spoken everywhere, making it easy to share the good news. Secondly, there was safe and easy travel. Safe roads built by the Roman Empire allowed messengers to travel quickly throughout the entire empire. Rome maintained thousands of miles of safe, paved roads because it possessed the organizational will and legal structure to enforce order. That physical connectivity inadvertently created the highway system for the early church to spread the Gospel across the Mediterranean then into Europe. People should begin to take this into account when the look around them at the crumbling infrastructure in America. If infrastructure morally and physically deteriorates destroying transfer of communication and goods it will bring a nation and its ideas to their knees.

So to see the imagery in verses 6–7 of abandoned roads and travelers forced onto "winding paths" is one of the most poignant metrics of societal breakdown in ancient literature. In the ancient Near East, public thoroughfares represented the bloodstream of a culture. Secure roads required a baseline of functional governance, active justice, and shared social trust. When those roads empty, it signals that public confidence has eroded. That is when citizens retreat into localized, defensive isolation, trade ceases, and public life freezes in collective paralysis. Social structure begins to fracture, communication breaks down leaving communities isolated and susceptible to fear and rumor. Economic movement stalls, shifting a society from proactive creation to mere survival. Civic courage vanishes, causing ordinary law-abiding citizens to forfeit responsibility and wait passively for extraordinary intervention. This intervention usually comes in the form of localized petty tyrants because no true leaders step forward.

When a nation enters this form of failed leadership and moral bankruptcy, destruction of physical and spiritual infrastructure are the two main symptoms. Roads deteriorate, communication deteriorates. Public discourse becomes unsafe. The public spaces become unsafe, and institutions fracture—not simply from a lack of tax revenue, but from a decay in the shared morality and civic duty required to maintain and protect them.

When thoroughfares, whether they be physical highways or public discourse become unreliable, inevitably society fractures into self-interests. People become isolationist or self-absorbed. Neighbor no longer looks out for their neighbor. The hearts of the people grow cold in an act of survival. People retreat to "winding paths" where accountability is low and the risk of exploitation is high. In these places lurks the worst type of people like murderers, thieves, rapists, etc.  Breaking down on the side of the road in a declining society isn't just a physical hazard; it leaves the vulnerable completely exposed to the lawlessness that fills a moral vacuum.

So how did Israel and how should America rectify the downward spiral? The secret of Deborah’s success in temporally slowing Israel’s descent is actually remarkably simple. Deborah was a mother in Israel in this song. She became a visible focal point of a nation and success. The past failures weren’t continually brought up to further damage national morale. The current victories were won and they were the one’s focused on. A nation is no more what it was in the past than a recovering drug addict is now. The recovering addict was formally a failure but now a success or at least trying to be. That is why what the educational systems, politicians and others are doing by focusing intently on our past national failures is so damaging to any forward progress for the well being of the United States. Yes, we’ve been less than a light on a hill. Conversely, constantly looking back will never allow us to look forward. A farmer plowing a field must look forward at a fixed point. If they look back, the rows become crooked and the harvest fails.

Luke 9:62 "No one who puts his hand to the plow and looks back is fit for the kingdom of God"

In this instance it is by Deborah herself and her wise and statesmanlike measures, internal administration, and a strong central leadership, that brought the fruits of military success to people’s own front doors to instill confidence again. She fostered a national spirit, encouraged a respect for law, and rendered it as safe to dwell in the country as within the walled city. The continuous policy of Deborah achieved the reconstitution of the land and freed it from internal lawlessness. Our nation could benefit from more leadership and wisdom like this.

Tell It to the Judge, Part II: A Killer Southpaw

So reading deeper into the Book of Judges I get to its third chapter. I come across a strange comment about the judge Ehud that warranted a deeper look.

Judges 3:12 Again the Israelites did evil in the eyes of the Lord, and because they did this evil the Lord gave Eglon king of Moab power over Israel. Getting the Ammonites and Amalekites to join him, Eglon came and attacked Israel, and they took possession of the City of Palms. The Israelites were subject to Eglon king of Moab for eighteen years. Again the Israelites cried out to the Lord, and he gave them a deliverer—Ehud, a left-handed man…

The text will go on to state that Ehud creates a double-edged sword with which to kill Eglon. This assassination will be done by Ehud with his left hand under the pretense of bringing a secret message to him in private.

Judges 12:21-22 Ehud reached with his left hand, drew the sword from his right thigh and plunged it into the king’s belly. Even the handle sank in after the blade, and his bowels discharged.

So the obvious question becomes, “Why the left hand?”

The Scientific/Medical Forensic

Based on wordage in the text and what we know medically, there are a few reasons a puncturing sweeping left abdomen wound would be preferred for an assassin. The heart and lungs being protected by the rib cage would make them prohibitively difficult to hit. Targeting the abdomen makes for a large, soft target that lacks the protection of the ribcage. Tactically, it is also the center or mass and hardest to get out of the way quickly, especially for a fat man like Eglon was. A hand or head can dodge or weave quickly, not an abdomen. It’s also closest to a neutral hand position for Ehud.

You also have many major blood vessels in the area targeted by Ehud. The abdomen houses critical vascular structures like the renal artery and branches tied to the aorta, which can cause rapid internal bleed out. It also contains vital organs. A deep penetration like Ehud would’ve produced with a double-edged sword in this region can damage organs like the liver, left kidney, spleen, or descending colon, leading to fatal hemorrhage. Therefore, the probability of a quick death as narrated in this passage would easily have been produced by a puncture of the liver or abdominal aorta artery. Either of these can lead to unconsciousness within a minute if executed exactly.

Then there is also the density and proximity of all the above accessible to a left-handed assassin sweeping a blade across an abdomen. An effective sharp, rising simultaneous perforation through a kidney, the diaphragm and into the thoracic cavity to puncture a lung would be nearly instantly lethal. The victim’s first exhalation pushes the air out and the perforated diaphragm makes replacing that air virtually impossible. Shock, unconsciousness, and death from blood loss and asphyxiation would follow quickly. We in fact read in the sword was pulled from Ehud’s right side and entered so deeply the handle was in the body also. So, therefore, a deep slashing puncture wound.

The Theological/Philosophical

The left hand or a left-handed man may be regarded as a type abnormality, eccentricity or even a disability in the time of the Judges or approx 1200 B.C.-1020 B.C. or late Bronze Age (or any time for that matter). For this alone it warrants examining why God would have a left-handed person doing this killing, medical reasoning aside. The phrase ‘left-handed man” in Hebrew literally means…"a man bound or obstructed in his right hand". Ehud may have been paralyzed or disabled. The real Jewish tribal irony is that Ehud belonged to the Tribe of Benjamin, a name that literally means "son of my right hand" or as Hebraism, “…son of my strength.” Furthermore, there may have been some genetic/hereditary abilities imparted to the Benjamites or a proclivity trained into them  because Judges also goes on to state this gem too…

Judges 20:15-16 At once the Benjamites mobilized twenty-six thousand swordsmen from their towns, in addition to seven hundred able young men from those living in Gibeah. Among all these soldiers there were seven hundred select troops who were left-handed, each of whom could sling a stone at a hair and not miss.

Left-handed men would have a distinct military advantage, especially when attacking as most combatants would’ve been right handed carrying shield in their left hands which would’ve made deflecting projectiles from a lefty nearly impossible. As we know from David and Goliath, this vulnerability is deadly.

Finally, I should also mention one other peculiarity about Old Testament southpaws. In 1 Chronicles 12:2 there is mention of another contingent of lefty soldiers who were also Benjamites. Again, this lends credence to the possibility there might have been something genetically unique about Benjamite manual dexterity. David's general Joab (Tribe of Judah, closely linked to Judah and southern kingdom) is shown to be either left-handed or ambidextrous in 2 Samuel 20:8-10. He grabs his opponents beard with his right hand while holding a sword in his left. The opponent takes no heed of the sword in his left and is undefended when Joab strikes.

So to surmise:

Benjamin was a “son of the right hand.” Ehud (and 700+ others) were Benjamite men whose right hand was somehow restricted either through disability or binding. Yet God places the sword or slings of deliverance in their left hands.

The Paradoxical Nature of God

In God’s providential goodness he permits peculiar variations from the norms of society. God does not form all men according to one exact pattern or mold. There is great variety in the nature, capacity and position of people. While many are in the center of the bell-curve there are some that are far removed from it. There is a high probability therefore that Eglon wouldn’t have deemed a left-handed man a direct immediate threat when is sword was fastened on his non-dominate side. Unfortunately, what Eglon failed to understand is that the left-handed man has the same heart as the right-handed man….capable of the highest good but also the ugliness of lethality when pressed by desperation. Guards usually searched visitors on their left side assuming they were right-handed and drew swords from their left hip; Ehud concealed his double-edged sword on his right thigh, bypassing security. Ehud is then able to implement his shocking purpose more securely through the element of surprise and Eglon letting his guard down in what appears to have been arrogance.

Ehud’s eccentricity or abnormal dexterity is turned to advantage. What first appears at first as nothing but a societal abnormality becomes a special aptitude. A peculiarity or shortcoming can always be turned into a positive. It may enable those who suffer from it to sympathize with and help others with similar difficulty. The the blind have a mission to the blind, the alcoholic to the alcoholic, the cancer survivor consuls the cancer patient. Suffering is the language and medium to consul the sufferer. A peculiarity itself becomes the tool or path by which God’s needed work is accomplished. Paradoxically, a peculiar disadvantage in one direction is often compensated for by peculiar advantages in another. This is often the mode by which God works through man. The first last and the last first.

A man who is weak in the right hand, is often strong in the left-hand. The blind often have a rare skill in music. Muscular weakness is often offset by intellectual strength. Deficient physical health is equalized by spiritual power. Therefore, instead of complaining of shortcomings we should associate with others not avoid those who have had similar issues and determine how to turn disadvantage into an advantage. It is the proverbial turning of lemons into lemonade.

God can use even the useless as a very useful thing. Therein we have the story of God using Onesimus in Philemon. The paradoxical abnormality in the letter to Philemon is that Philemon was a free man who owned a slave. Onesimus was the slave that Paul writes to Philemon about to free him. Paul is writing to him from Roman imprisonment. Onesmus’ name means ‘useless’ in Greek, but he is very useful in making a point to shame Philemon into freeing Onesimus even while Paul is in prison so that Onesimus can carry Paul’s message to the world outside the prison.

In the end it is just another example of thousands that the Bible shows divine subversion of human arrogance or supposed cleverness. Christian and Jewish thought highlights how God consistently uses what society deems weak, overlooked, or disabled to turn the tides of history.

2 Corinthians 12:9 But he said to me, "My grace is sufficient for you, for my power is made perfect in weakness." Therefore I will boast all the more gladly of my weaknesses, so that the power of Christ may rest upon me.

The Lindsey Clancy Horrorshow

So apparently people still don't get the full panoptic of what we're dealing with in society. The inability to understand the staggering injustice of Lindsey Clancy methodically killing her children is merely a symptom of a much larger spiritual disease that is actually a judgment against a nation. America is not only in decline, it is actively under judgment by Biblical standards. I've said it numerous times before but it warrants saying again because I've heard so many implying a question through a statement similar to this:

"I honestly do not understand what is going on in society anymore with this Clancy case. I can't comprehend a mother killing her children. What is more troubling is the women supporting it under the guise of postpartum depression."

I present a quick Biblical aside from 2 Timothy 3:1-6 and and a detour to Paul’s letter to the Romans in this post.

There will be terrible times in the last days. People will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boastful, proud, abusive, disobedient to their parents, ungrateful, unholy, without love, unforgiving, slanderous, without self-control, brutal, not lovers of the good, treacherous, rash, conceited, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God......They are the kind who worm their way into homes and gain control over gullible women, who are loaded down with sins and are swayed by all kinds of evil desires...

The passage above is describing the root cause of a complete breakdown of society during "terrible times" in the last days. The text warns that people will become "unloving or specifically without natural affection" or astorgoi/ ἄστοργοι in Greek. Theologically the historical interpretation of this Greek word in context is understood as the ultimate corruption of natural bonds—specifically parents becoming callous, cold, or negligent toward the welfare of their own children.

In the context of the Lindsey Clancy horror show the phrase “unloving/without natural affection” is significant because storgē refers to natural familial affection or the bonds between her and the children she brutally murdered. Paul places the absence of astorgoi/ ἄστοργοι alongside brutality, lack of self-control and rejection of what is good. When a society begins losing its understanding of paternal love, it is not merely experiencing a political or moral problem. It is experiencing a massive spiritual problem. So this passage now provides us a biblical framework for discussing the horrifying breakdown of natural moral bonds in this case. If family is the building block of society it would begin to explain why the entirety of society is now in full freefall.

The family also needs to be seen as the building block of the Church which is why Paul writes this portion. It is a warning not just to individuals but to the Church. The endgame for the Devil is to bring the Church down. Family destruction is just a collateral damage or serendipitous side effects of the evil. Timothy is not merely being given a lesson about wicked people “out there.” Paul is warning Timothy about conditions that will affect the people and communities within normal society and the Church. That is the exact reason I have seen women on social media who claim to be Christian right within the Church touting support for Clancy. Their minds are twisted or they’re gullible.

While the Clancy case isn't necessarily the cause of the cultural problem—it is an especially horrifying illustration of a deeper problem Paul warned about. The erosion of self-control, moral restraint and love of God. The farther we've gotten away from God and scripture the more debased our actions have become. Paul described the corruption of the instincts that ordinarily hold human society together. Paternal instincts. That is why so many are making perplexed statements of disbelief searching for an answer to the madness. Those stating types of statements can’t possibly comprehend what is going on with the cold, callous people since they are not one of them. To understand the madness, you must become the madness.

What we now need to contend with is the degeneration of society. What happens to a society when self-control, natural affection and love for God have eroded? The Christian answer cannot simply be, “I don't understand how society got this way.” Paul told us what happens when humanity turns away from God in these passages. When God is rejected, His truth is rejected. When His truth is rejected, moral boundaries are rejected. When moral boundaries are rejected, desires that once were restrained become celebrated, defended, and normalized.

Romans 1:28-31 Furthermore, just as they did not think it worthwhile to retain the knowledge of God, so God gave them over to a depraved mind, so that they do what ought not to be done. They have become filled with every kind of wickedness, evil, greed and depravity. They are full of envy, murder, strife, deceit and malice. They are gossips, slanderers, God-haters, insolent, arrogant and boastful; they invent ways of doing evil

Furthermore…

Romans 1:32 Although they know God’s righteous decree that those who do such things deserve death, they not only continue to do these very things but also approve of those who practice them.

The irony of v.32 tells us exactly why there are so many women supporting a murderer who slaughtered her three children, “…they not only continue to do these very things but also approve of those who practice them.” Many of these women have what some would call toxic empathy. Those supporting this have had their brains seared because they are godless. So their minds don’t function in the manner they were made to. This is why Paul would earlier say:

1 Timothy 4:1-2 Now the Spirit expressly says that in later times some will depart from the faith by devoting themselves to deceitful spirits and teachings of demons, such teachings come through hypocritical liars, whose consciences have been seared as with a hot iron.

The act of searing flesh will, over time numb it by destroying nerve endings near the surface due to scar tissue that builds up. Repeated burning will only increase and thicken the scar tissue. In society people’s minds and thinking have become numb over repetitive searing.

The further society moves from God, the more deeply human rebellion and enmity against God digs its heels in and affects our understanding of gender, marriage, family, sexuality, responsibility, authority, self-control, and value of human life. This is why we should not be surprised when a culture that has spent a century rejecting biblical authority begins producing increasingly distorted ideas about morality.

If we ever hope of living in a normal society again, Christians need to do the following to push back against the tide of darkness we see enveloping us…

• We should grieve the victims.
• We should condemn evil.
• We should name the evil explicitly while holding people accountable that committed it.
• We should show compassion toward those suffering from mental illness.
• We should be able to discern if said actions are actually demonic in origin stop it.
• We should study the spiritual/moral condition of the culture and turn to God to fix what we can.

While we can simultaneously have compassion for people suffering from real mental illness, we must never be confused with calling evil good or the demonic a mental issue. The Bible delineates the two. Lindsey Clancy clearly stated she heard a male voice tell her to do it. We can acknowledge the devastating effects of postpartum and other psychiatric illnesses while still maintaining the biblical conviction that the taking of innocent human life is profoundly evil and needs to be punished, not acquitted or freed of all responsibility because of blame shifting.

When the bonds that God designed to hold families together begin to unravel, the consequences will not remain confined to the family. They will eventually be felt throughout society destroying society and inevitably the Church. 

So…the question isn’t: 

“What is wrong with society?” 

The more important question is: 

“How far have we wandered from God and how do we get back?”